Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Trucks & Trailers
Reload this Page >

New GM 3.0L diesel 1500 has the same torque and cost as the 6.2 L

Notices

New GM 3.0L diesel 1500 has the same torque and cost as the 6.2 L

Old 03-26-2019, 03:42 PM
  #1  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default New GM 3.0L diesel 1500 has the same torque and cost as the 6.2 L

Interesting. I'd guess with the price delta between gas and diesel, the nod still slightly goes to the 6.2L even though the diesel will get better gas mileage.

But it appears the diesel will be available in 2wd models and lower level trims, so that's a notable difference.

https://jalopnik.com/the-2019-chevy-...tha-1833563155
Likes:
Old 03-26-2019, 07:49 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dryden/Ludington, MI - Steamboat, CO
Posts: 1,978
Received 551 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

The diesel will not get better gas mileage.........
Old 03-26-2019, 07:55 PM
  #3  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
THT sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On the Flats
Posts: 7,753
Received 1,205 Likes on 576 Posts
Default

For only $2400 upgrade the 6.2 all the way. I cruise at 80 mph getting 19 mpg in a Denali XL with a 6.2.
Likes:
Old 03-26-2019, 09:22 PM
  #4  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rocky Point FL
Posts: 8,741
Received 1,605 Likes on 769 Posts
Default

This is exactly why the mid size truck market is going to explode. The sick truth is the full size truck makes has gone the way of the offshore center console unobtanium prices are moving us minions to the cheap seats. 40k for a tricked out Ranger WTF. Yes you too can by a 3rd world UTE for 40k
Old 03-26-2019, 09:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,335
Received 299 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

If there's no mini Allison transmission, I see no point.

The Duramax without an Allison transmission is as useless as a 1 ton truck with a gas motor.
Likes:
Old 03-27-2019, 05:45 AM
  #6  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winterville & MHC, NC
Posts: 4,956
Received 577 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manoverboard123 View Post
If there's no mini Allison transmission, I see no point.

The Duramax without an Allison transmission is as useless as a 1 ton truck with a gas motor.

While I have a 2500 Duramax with he Allison, the Allison was developed by GM and they paid to use the the Allison branding from what I understand. It is not the Allison of old and that includes my truck.


I will stick with a 3/4 ton truck but I can see the smaller Duramax in my driveway should they put it in a SUV for my wife.
Old 03-27-2019, 05:51 AM
  #7  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,212
Received 1,042 Likes on 648 Posts
Default

That's a pretty reasonable upgrade cost for a v6 diesel, especially once you factor in MSRP prices are where negotiations start, not what you're going to pay.
Old 03-27-2019, 07:33 AM
  #8  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

Its a straight 6 diesel

Originally Posted by jj1987 View Post
That's a pretty reasonable upgrade cost for a v6 diesel, especially once you factor in MSRP prices are where negotiations start, not what you're going to pay.
Old 03-27-2019, 07:34 AM
  #9  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

I don;t think i ever saw 19 in my Sierra 6.2l

Originally Posted by Flatout71 View Post
For only $2400 upgrade the 6.2 all the way. I cruise at 80 mph getting 19 mpg in a Denali XL with a 6.2.
Old 03-27-2019, 07:42 AM
  #10  
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburb of Sugar Tit SC
Posts: 14,093
Received 9,146 Likes on 4,924 Posts
Default

Interested to see how this one does in the market. Seems like the perfect powerplant for the guy that runs a lot of miles on the interstate unloaded, or spends a lot of times towing light to moderate loads. The fuel economy advantage in that situation would be noteworthy.
Old 03-27-2019, 07:58 AM
  #11  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

The 6.2L has the highest towing available in a GM 1500--only a few hundred pounds shy of the 2500HD Duramax. Since the torque is the same (but HP is not) between the diesel and the 6.2l, I'd expect to see towing amounts to be similar as well.

Many on here have been clamoring for a more powerful engine in a less equipped truck--here it is.

I remember years ago asking on here why a manufacturer hadn't put a medium sized (~4-5.0l) diesel in a 1500 series truck to get 30 mpg and tow 10K pounds and got laughed at for it. "A diesel engine will never get 30 mpg" they said. Well..10 years later it looks like it will.

Originally Posted by autobaun70 View Post
Interested to see how this one does in the market. Seems like the perfect powerplant for the guy that runs a lot of miles on the interstate unloaded, or spends a lot of times towing light to moderate loads. The fuel economy advantage in that situation would be noteworthy.
Old 03-27-2019, 08:06 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Baltimore md
Posts: 2,219
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe View Post
The 6.2L has the highest towing available in a GM 1500--only a few hundred pounds shy of the 2500HD Duramax. Since the torque is the same (but HP is not) between the diesel and the 6.2l, I'd expect to see towing amounts to be similar as well.

Many on here have been clamoring for a more powerful engine in a less equipped truck--here it is.

I remember years ago asking on here why a manufacturer hadn't put a medium sized (~4-5.0l) diesel in a 1500 series truck to get 30 mpg and tow 10K pounds and got laughed at for it. "A diesel engine will never get 30 mpg" they said. Well..10 years later it looks like it will.
While you are correct on the diesel knocking on the door of 30mpg. You are wrong on the 5.0 diesel making much sense in a 1500. These engines are significantly heavier then their gas counter parts. I think the big three nailed the displacement on this. When you add weight you take payload and towing lbs away. Your don't wanna screw up the driveability of a half ton by making it front heavy. Then larger brakes and suspension components are required. Then you have a 3/4 ton truck with a 5.0 diesel.
​​
Likes:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:12 AM
  #13  
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburb of Sugar Tit SC
Posts: 14,093
Received 9,146 Likes on 4,924 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe View Post
The 6.2L has the highest towing available in a GM 1500--only a few hundred pounds shy of the 2500HD Duramax. Since the torque is the same (but HP is not) between the diesel and the 6.2l, I'd expect to see towing amounts to be similar as well.

Many on here have been clamoring for a more powerful engine in a less equipped truck--here it is.

I remember years ago asking on here why a manufacturer hadn't put a medium sized (~4-5.0l) diesel in a 1500 series truck to get 30 mpg and tow 10K pounds and got laughed at for it. "A diesel engine will never get 30 mpg" they said. Well..10 years later it looks like it will.
I still think that a "big" power oriented diesel would be a better seller. Wish they had revived plans for the 4.5L that they discussed a few years back.
Likes:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:14 AM
  #14  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,490
Received 522 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by autobaun70 View Post
Interested to see how this one does in the market. Seems like the perfect powerplant for the guy that runs a lot of miles on the interstate unloaded, or spends a lot of times towing light to moderate loads. The fuel economy advantage in that situation would be noteworthy.
That's me but my current GM 1500 transmission has left a bad taste in my mouth
Old 03-27-2019, 08:22 AM
  #15  
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburb of Sugar Tit SC
Posts: 14,093
Received 9,146 Likes on 4,924 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by On the Half Shell View Post
That's me but my current GM 1500 transmission has left a bad taste in my mouth
8 speed?
Old 03-27-2019, 08:23 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dryden/Ludington, MI - Steamboat, CO
Posts: 1,978
Received 551 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by On the Half Shell View Post
That's me but my current GM 1500 transmission has left a bad taste in my mouth
Everything GM post bailout has left a bad taste in my mouth. Cheaply made crap. Its catching up with them.
Old 03-27-2019, 08:50 AM
  #17  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Reading, PA/Indian River, DE
Posts: 3,158
Received 553 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Salmonbum View Post
The diesel will not get better gas mileage.........
Yes it will.

As far as towing, it will be interesting to see what they rate it for. The F150 with the Power Stroke has a tow rating right up there with the other engine offerings whereas the Ram Ecodiesel ended up on the lower end. Rumors so far, to be taken with a grain of salt have had the Duramax on the lower end.
Old 03-27-2019, 09:00 AM
  #18  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

Well, I did say 4-5l.

Originally Posted by sonickevin95 View Post
While you are correct on the diesel knocking on the door of 30mpg. You are wrong on the 5.0 diesel making much sense in a 1500. These engines are significantly heavier then their gas counter parts. I think the big three nailed the displacement on this. When you add weight you take payload and towing lbs away. Your don't wanna screw up the driveability of a half ton by making it front heavy. Then larger brakes and suspension components are required. Then you have a 3/4 ton truck with a 5.0 diesel.
​​
Old 03-27-2019, 09:01 AM
  #19  
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburb of Sugar Tit SC
Posts: 14,093
Received 9,146 Likes on 4,924 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jtav2002 View Post


Yes it will.

As far as towing, it will be interesting to see what they rate it for. The F150 with the Power Stroke has a tow rating right up there with the other engine offerings whereas the Ram Ecodiesel ended up on the lower end. Rumors so far, to be taken with a grain of salt have had the Duramax on the lower end.
I don't even think a lower rating will hurt it that much. The main thing it needs to do is get good mileage unloaded, and decent mileage when loaded or towing up to say 5,000 - 6,000 lbs. That's about the max weight that it makes sense to do high mileage towing with a 1/2 ton. Also, in that weight range, it needs to act like a 3/4 ton/1 ton diesel with 10,000 - 12,000 behind it. In other words, pull hard and almost exclusively at low RPM, at interstate speed.
Likes:
Old 03-27-2019, 09:01 AM
  #20  
Joe
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 17,118
Received 1,318 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

Agreed. But at least this opens up some options on what is available.

Originally Posted by autobaun70 View Post
I still think that a "big" power oriented diesel would be a better seller. Wish they had revived plans for the 4.5L that they discussed a few years back.
Likes:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.