Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Marine Electronics Forum
Reload this Page >

Inshore fishing: Down scan or side scan beneficial?

Notices
Marine Electronics Forum
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By mdees88
  • 1 Post By semperfifishing
  • 1 Post By oneoverpar

Inshore fishing: Down scan or side scan beneficial?

Old 12-01-2017, 02:11 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 7
Default Inshore fishing: Down scan or side scan beneficial?

I'm new to inshore fishing and am considering a Garmin Striker Plus 7sv or an Echomap Plus 44 cv. But I'm not sure what depth is necessary for down scanning or side scanning to be beneficial or even accurate? Or is the mapping function with the Echomap the most useful of all. Any advice would be helpful. Thanks.
catman5339 is offline  
Old 12-01-2017, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
THT sponsor
Marine Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21,959
Default

Down and Side Scan is mostly used for location of structure and for bottom detail.
It's can detect some fish..but that is not as good as the traditional transducer elements.

Fortunately most units use both structure scan and traditional in one transducer.
Most Side and Down scan units work best in less than 150'...and at speed less than 10 mph.
Very helpful fro location of structure...and reducing search time.


.

Last edited by semperfifishing; 12-03-2017 at 02:43 PM.
semperfifishing is online now  
Old 12-02-2017, 05:20 AM
  #3  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 200
Default

Adding to Semper's comments, DS and SS will show some fish, like Semper says. Find myself using it less with a good 2D setup/chirp
treeguyus is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 01:33 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 7
Default

Is there a minimum depth for DS and SS, in particular, to be effective? I do want to identify rock piles and potholes among the mangroves and ICW in my area. Do I need DS & SS or a good mapping unit? Thanks.
catman5339 is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 06:17 PM
  #5  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stapleton, AL
Posts: 2,820
Default

Sidescan is a must. I use it primarily offshore to locate artificial reefs and wrecks in 50-120ft of water. BUT.... I use it a lot in 20ft of water and less to locate brush piles for crappie fishing. It will make finding your rockpiles very easy. I had a Garmin 74sv and it performed very well. I never used any mapping features. I just ran around with sidescan until I found some structure then I saved it on the chartplotter.

Once you start using sidescan you will want to have your chartplotter set up in split screen. When I bought the 7" I thought it was huge. Unfortunately when running it splitscreen it's like looking at two different 3.5" machines. After owning the 7" I always tell people 9" is the smallest I would recommend if you plan on using sidescan, though the 7" did work. I have since sold my 74sv and bought a 1042xsv. MUCH better.....

If I were you I would be looking at getting an echommap or echomap plus 74sv or 94sv.

The sidescan will work very shallow. Here's a pic in 2.5ft of water. It clearly shows each bank of the very narrow creek I was in. It also shows a couple fish and a log on the bottom....

Name:  05AUG17_1751_00.png
Views: 699
Size:  750.7 KB
dcouture29 likes this.
mdees88 is online now  
Old 12-03-2017, 01:44 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 147
Default

Agree with mdees. After learning structure scan it is a great tool to have. I like it much better than traditional sonar. I also, have a 7" and regret not going bigger.
Starplex is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 02:34 PM
  #7  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location:
Posts: 513
Default

I wouldn't have a machine without side scan, it helps me so much when the bait is not showing on the top, I can find my schools of menhaden off to the side and get a net on them
offracing is offline  
Old 12-03-2017, 03:14 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Stuart FL
Posts: 394
Default

Side scan inshore is a must, Capt Blair Wiggins has video where he did a show here in Stuart and showed as he was passing dock piling it was picking up fish next to them.
Rundeep is online now  
Old 12-07-2017, 11:14 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 7
Default

I think I am sold on the echomap 9sv. Anything more and I'm afraid the FF will be worth more than my boat. I am also not sure whether I would make use of the WiFi capability with the Plus version. Now to find a good deal. West Marine is running a deal with $200 off through 12/24. Anybody know of a better deal?
catman5339 is offline  
Old 12-07-2017, 11:30 AM
  #10  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
THT sponsor
Marine Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21,959
Default

If possible see if the West Marine close out units have the GT51 transducer..and not the cv51..
mdees88 likes this.
semperfifishing is online now  
Old 12-07-2017, 11:38 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 7
Default

What is the difference between a GT51 and a CV51 transducer? Thanks
catman5339 is offline  
Old 12-07-2017, 12:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Connecticut & Misquamicut, RI
Posts: 730
Default

Originally Posted by catman5339 View Post
What is the difference between a GT51 and a CV51 transducer? Thanks
Maybe Gil can chime in if I am wrong here. The Garmin GT51 is a 3 element TD. ( A down element and 2 side elements) There was some sort of patent infringement battle between Garmin and Lowrance/Simrad and Garmin subsequently pulled the GT51's off the market. They replaced them with the CV51 which only has 2 side elements which overlap the down scan for a synthesized down view. Hope I got this right.
RustyGaff is offline  
Old 12-07-2017, 12:47 PM
  #13  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stapleton, AL
Posts: 2,820
Default

Originally Posted by catman5339 View Post
What is the difference between a GT51 and a CV51 transducer? Thanks
This is my understanding....

The GT51 has a 600w traditional chitp element, 2 side scanning elements totalling 500w, and a downvu element at 500w.

Garmin got sued over the technology in this transducer. Then they started making the CV51.

The CV51 has 600w traditional chirp element, 2 side scanning elements totaling 500w, but has NO down facing element.

The two side scanning elements overlap to digitally produce a dowvu image. So the GT51 has a dedicated downvu element and should have a clearer, more accurate downvu image.

In traditional and sidescan the transducers should perform the same. Just in downvu, or clearvu, or bottom view (whatever they call it now) the CV might perform a little worse than the GT.
mdees88 is online now  
Old 12-07-2017, 12:57 PM
  #14  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
THT sponsor
Marine Advertiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21,959
Default

Originally Posted by catman5339 View Post
What is the difference between a GT51 and a CV51 transducer? Thanks
Confusion about Garmin GT series transducers
Here is a post about the GT series..vs cv units.



The GT 51 has a dedicated Down facing element for Down Vu (structure).

The cv51 does not have a dedicated down element but shares the side elements to producer a down scan.

Last edited by semperfifishing; 12-08-2017 at 09:47 AM.
semperfifishing is online now  
Old 12-08-2017, 09:28 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 424
Default

I also have the 7" and will upgrade soon to at least a 9.
mdees88 likes this.
oneoverpar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread