Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Dockside Chat
Reload this Page >

The lawyers who took on Big Tobacco are aiming at Realtors and their 6% fee

Notices
Like Tree111Likes

The lawyers who took on Big Tobacco are aiming at Realtors and their 6% fee

Old 03-19-2019, 08:44 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,788
Default The lawyers who took on Big Tobacco are aiming at Realtors and their 6% fee

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bi...fee-2019-03-19
UT_VOLS13 is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 08:54 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Harsens Island, MI
Posts: 48
Default

I've always questioned how a realtor can get a 6% fee when architects and consulting engineers often can't.
steeveau is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 08:56 AM
  #3  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,417
Default

Price fixing needs to be challenged.
Next they can take on medical insurance contracts with network providers. It's bullshit.
chrispnet is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:15 AM
  #4  
UCF
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Orlando & Key Colony Beach
Posts: 1,035
Default

Originally Posted by steeveau View Post
I've always questioned how a realtor can get a 6% fee when architects and consulting engineers often can't.
I just expanded my dock. I had to hire an engineer. I had to pay the engineer upfront. If the army corp declined my request (engineered plans), the engineer was still paided.

I think if realtors go to that kind of pay structure, the customary 3% fee to each realtor would change. If they were paid hourly or by each showing or by each item they worked on, it would be different. Some sellers would be ahead of the 6%, some would be more costly than 6%.

It would also cut back on expenses that realtors pay upfront hoping the property sells. Less upfront costs could lower the commission and realtors could make the same.

I dont neccesarily see the case winning, because there are alot of options for listing your home. 6% isnt set in stone. Can be less or can be more. Its negotiable.
RyanL11 and clear like this.
UCF is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:21 AM
  #5  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,146
Default

Originally Posted by UCF View Post
I just expanded my dock. I had to hire an engineer. I had to pay the engineer upfront. If the army corp declined my request (engineered plans), the engineer was still paided.

I think if realtors go to that kind of pay structure, the customary 3% fee to each realtor would change. If they were paid hourly or by each showing or by each item they worked on, it would be different. Some sellers would be ahead of the 6%, some would be more costly than 6%.

It would also cut back on expenses that realtors pay upfront hoping the property sells. Less upfront costs could lower the commission and realtors could make the same.

I dont neccesarily see the case winning, because there are alot of options for listing your home. 6% isnt set in stone. Can be less or can be more. Its negotiable.
There should be a "marketing fee" plus commission ( a lot less than 6%) If you want them to run ads then you pay for advertising. if you don't want to pay for advertising then you get nothing but MLS listing.
amofgreenville is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:26 AM
  #6  
CME
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,846
Default

Good!!
alligatorgar likes this.
CME is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:34 AM
  #7  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Simons Island
Posts: 2,945
Default

In a typical situation a realtor only gets 1.5%. Buyer has agent, seller has agent both get 3% - then the brokerage gets 1.5% leaving the realtor with 1.5%.

There is a lot of liability involved. Personally I think the seller should pay half and the buyer should pay half. That only makes sense.
Thalasso and RyanL11 like this.
SEATOAD is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:37 AM
  #8  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,870
Default

There is no reason realtors can't be replaced by technology. Honestly, there is some antitrust type things going on in the industry.
Lorne Greene is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:38 AM
  #9  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,417
Default

Originally Posted by SEATOAD View Post
...

There is a lot of liability involved. ...
Never saw much liability accruing to the agents/brokers in a real estate transaction.
Nothing beyond what a standard errors/omissions policy would address anyhow.
chrispnet is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:45 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 7
Default

This is far from set in stone, I just sold a home, realtor charged 3.5%, not 6.

And it's not true the agents take half the commission.

They get whatever they negotiated with the salesman. My salesman made 70% of the 1.5% and is in talks with another agency to collect 80%.

The other agency got 2%, not sure how they pay the salesman. I hear 60% is normal....

You can always do FSBO, I did it once, was super easy.

This lawsuit makes no sense.
walshie is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:47 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Southeast Connecticut
Posts: 208
Default

Ahh...all the armchair quarterbacks passing judgement on jobs they haven't the slightest clue about. My wife has been a successful Realtor for years..she's in the top 5% in my state of CT. Just got a top award from the Re/Max regional boss.

I see how hard she works for her clients. I see how much money and effort and other resources she puts into her work.
They get nickle and dimed to death with fees for this, fees for that, signs, lock boxes, advertising, staging, food and drink for showings, brokers cut, the state having hands in their pocket for every possible fee and tax and license and this and that and more. Non stop mandatory classes and certifications..all expensive.

If you actually saw how many hours they put into a real estate transaction..from start, to finish, you'd be amazed. They're on their phone and computers from early in the morning to late and night, and in between. Phone won't go more than 15 minutes without some ding or ring. It's a 20+ hour a day job!

At the end of the year, yeah..money brought in for their business looks good. But take away all the expensive...there's their "take home"....most people would walk away from that amount after knowing what kind of work goes into it. I'm a damn hard worker that easily goes above 12 or 14 or more hours a day for my job..and she's still busting her lass long after I close my laptop for the evening.
YeOldeStonecat is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:49 AM
  #12  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Weymouth, Ma.
Posts: 2,078
Default

There are probably 5 times more RE Sales associates than necessary. The vast majority are part time and married to highly paid professionals. It is a glorified social club and gives them an excuse to say they have a job. There are no benefits at all and can require working nights weekends without health benefits, vacation time, retirement, etc. The Brpker/Pricinples that hire the agents are the only one that make out in the deal and it's common for a RE office to have 50-100 agents and don't have to pay any of them a dime. If brokers had to pay a base salary plus commission to agents they would get rid of the part timers and only hire real professionals. In the end it would be better for the industry and consumers as well. Until then the market will seek out other alternatives and many buyers will opt to do FSBO.
SEATOAD, BSpot, TorFed and 2 others like this.
hottoddie is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:49 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 1,762
Default

6% is ridiculous. Been a while, but I'm pretty sure I told my agent the max % I would pay. I think I told her 4%. That was split between both buyer and seller agents.
Graddy-fied likes this.
Belzelbub is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:54 AM
  #14  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenville/MHC, NC
Posts: 2,609
Default

Dumb lawsuit.

No one is forcing you to sign with a realtor. I have bought and sold real estate thru a realtor and FSOB.

A couple of years ago when I sold my place in Beaufort the realtor was well worth her commission. She got things done I would have never accomplished.
RyanL11 likes this.
aFORDable is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 09:58 AM
  #15  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,879
Default

Excellent news!
jj1987 is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 10:07 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: South Central Ohio
Posts: 529
Default

Good. Absolutely useless industry.

Was looking at selling my home a few years ago. Interviewed some realtors. One guy charged 2% more than the rest. I asked him what services he could provide that the others couldn't at a lower price. He couldn't give me a straight answer.

Last time I was trying to buy a home, I was pre-approved for $150k. I was looking in the $100k range, which is pretty average for my area for a 3 bed house. One realtor refused to show me one of his listings unless I signed that he was my buying agent henceforth and he'd cut a cut of any house I bought even if it wasn't through him. I refused.

I asked another realtor to put together some houses for me to look at, and stipulated that I was not interested in a mobile home or any sort of manufactured house. First house we looked at was a double wide. I told him thanks for wasting my time and left.

Finally ended up buying a place from a coworker at a steep discount, partially because we didn't use a realtor, we just did a private party sale.
waybomb likes this.
lugoismad is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 10:10 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Providing for grubers
Posts: 3,590
Default

Originally Posted by CME View Post
Good!!
Right!!
If there's one thing we need more of in the U.S. it's lawsuits. Far too many people are writing their own deals. We need lawyers to make sure THEY sue everyone to comply with THEIR sense of fairness!!

</sarc>
SalmonDaze is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 10:16 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Va.
Posts: 17,064
Default

My parents just sold a home and they had "the best" realtor around. They had a contract that stated "as is" and their inspection was for exploratory reasons only. They found about $7000 in water and termite damage. Some how their realtor talked them into paying for the repairs even though the contract stated "as Is". She just want the sale to go through without any issues. Screw my parents.
fishingfun is online now  
Old 03-19-2019, 10:19 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 271
Default

Originally Posted by UCF View Post
I just expanded my dock. I had to hire an engineer. I had to pay the engineer upfront. If the army corp declined my request (engineered plans), the engineer was still paided.

I think if realtors go to that kind of pay structure, the customary 3% fee to each realtor would change. If they were paid hourly or by each showing or by each item they worked on, it would be different. Some sellers would be ahead of the 6%, some would be more costly than 6%.

It would also cut back on expenses that realtors pay upfront hoping the property sells. Less upfront costs could lower the commission and realtors could make the same.

I dont neccesarily see the case winning, because there are alot of options for listing your home. 6% isnt set in stone. Can be less or can be more. Its negotiable.
I get your point.

I also consider how VA has made it illegal to sell real estate with a real agent or a lawyer. I don't understand all the particulars. I do understand such laws allow realtors and lawyers to strong arm on pricing and guarantees them a piece of the financial sale on every transaction, which I think is wrong. Even though I see how it is prudent and avoid problems. I tend to think if you can make me use a service you can also dictate what they have to charge for said service ...and it should be no more than twice decent wage. Or the powers could just stay out of business.
Finsinchessy is offline  
Old 03-19-2019, 10:20 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Va.
Posts: 17,064
Default

If I'm correct lawyers have been pretty much cut from the closing process now days. You have a standard contract then a title agency does everything from there.
fishingfun is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread