Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Dockside Chat
Reload this Page >

Boeing 737 MAX is stupidly designed

Notices
Like Tree186Likes

Boeing 737 MAX is stupidly designed

Old 03-21-2019, 03:55 AM
  #181  
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: On The Razors Edge
Posts: 9,937
Default

It's being reported that the pilot of the Ethiopian flight that crashed, didn't do any updated simulator training for the Max 8, with the airline, even though they had the technology available. And the co-pilot never did any simulator training for the Max 8, at all.
Just1more is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 05:48 AM
  #182  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

If there's anything I can see that's "criminal" so far, it's that someone let that LionAir aircraft go on another flight before the reported symptoms from the previous flight were addressed. Somehow all that info got left out of the preliminary report they released. Can't imagine that was unintentional either.
Just1more likes this.
km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 05:57 AM
  #183  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bradenton FL
Posts: 2,048
Default

Originally Posted by km1125 View Post
Complete BullSh!t.

The planes cannot fly themselves (yet) and need a trained, experienced crew to run them and correct maintenance to keep them flying. Proof of that was in the previous LionAir flight where they identified the issue on the previous flight - which landed fine - but then DIDN'T address the reported issue and sent the plane back in the air again!!

You could also blame Boeing, the airlines and the FAA for eliminating the Flight Engineers in the cockpit. Those guys were responsible for keeping an eye on all the airframes' systems and identifying if there was a problem with how they are operating., and help the pilot and copilot work around the issue.
So you proved my point. The pilots don't understand it, the maintenance crews don't understand it. Maybe Boeing should make an airplane that's understandable to their users instead of pushing the envelope. We are talking about mothers, fathers, and children dying. You think LionAir hasn't sent other planes (Airbus) into air with previous reported issues. If the did it with the Boeing, they did it with other planes. How come AirBus's aren't falling out of the sky?
lazyboi1212 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 06:01 AM
  #184  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by lazyboi1212 View Post
So you proved my point. The pilots don't understand it, the maintenance crews don't understand it. Maybe Boeing should make an airplane that's understandable to their users instead of pushing the envelope. We are talking about mothers, fathers, and children dying. You think LionAir hasn't sent other planes (Airbus) into air with previous reported issues. If the did it with the Boeing, they did it with other planes. How come AirBus's aren't falling out of the sky?
As has been pointed out **numerous** times before, "runaway trim" IS a condition that pilots have to periodically deal with, for a number of reasons. There IS a procedure to do this and it appears neither of these flights followed that (although we don't have all the facts in yet).
km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 06:12 AM
  #185  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Globetrottin, Earth
Posts: 938
Default

Originally Posted by km1125 View Post
As has been pointed out **numerous** times before, "runaway trim" IS a condition that pilots have to periodically deal with, for a number of reasons. There IS a procedure to do this and it appears neither of these flights followed that (although we don't have all the facts in yet).

I would say I would draw a picture for him.... But I already did that.... Multiple times...... Big pretty pictures... So big you don't even need glasses......


ProppedUp is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 06:28 AM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

Another question for the pilots.... are the aircraft manuals and printed aids (quick reference guides, etc) written in English and all the native languages of the airlines that use them? I know English is the primary/required ATC language, but could there be issues with translations in the printed documentation that might make it more difficult for non-native-English folks to find information in the documentation?

I'm just curious. I don't think that's a Boeing problem but could be an airline or country or required training/prerequisites problem.
km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:15 AM
  #187  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: North NJ
Posts: 640
Default

A great overview of what we currently know, from a pilot and a reporter that is pretty good at just going over facts. He has some opinions in there also.

TurboJoe is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:22 AM
  #188  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by SilverGraphite View Post
From a redundancy standpoint, 2 sensors is no better than 1, and perhaps actually worse. If you have 2 sensors providing redundant data, then you also have to decide what happens when the two redundant sensors don't agree. Presumably one sensor has gone bad, but how to determine which one? Whether you use only one sensor or two, it still requires the operator to intervene and if you have two, then it's an extra step for the operator to have to take to resolve which one is still good. The operator then also has to have a way to exclude the bad sensor. If you only have one, it's simple - the only one is the bad one and you shut it down. Once you get to three redundant sensors you can implement rules in the system to exclude data from the erroneous sensor without operator intervention (other than a warning to the operator).

Also a question for the commercial pilots on here. I'm just a lowly self-grounded SEL VFR pilot, so I don't know how this translates to the big twins and multis. Is it generally fair to assume (turbulence etc notwithstanding) that if you set power to something reasonable and maintain altitude and airspeed that AOA will take care of itself?
not quite how it works, but you're on the right track. If you set power and altitude, then airspeed falls out..... If you set power and airspeed then climb rate falls out. If you set airspeed and altitude, then it takes a specific power to hold those two. Yes alpha takes care of itself in normal conditions within the flight envelope, but a pilot may wonder if he's getting erroneous readings from any of those variables. Also, ice on the wing can wreak havoc on these equations.
Kenny Powers is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:49 AM
  #189  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 1,515
Default

Originally Posted by TurboJoe View Post
A great overview of what we currently know, from a pilot and a reporter that is pretty good at just going over facts. He has some opinions in there also.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ts_AjU89Qk
This was very good. Thanks for posting.
TurboJoe likes this.
SweetD is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:35 AM
  #190  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 223
Default

Originally Posted by TurboJoe View Post
I For the pilots out there, can you be type rated on two types for commercial flying? (besides 767/757).
Yes, you can have many, many Type Ratings but in order to fly more than one plane regularly, the pilot must be 'current' in both Types. That means that his Sim Checks are current and that he's made 3 T/Os and landings within the past 90 days, etc. That might be more common in the Corporate World.

But keep in mind that many US airline guys also fly in the Reserves. So a guy might get home from flying his 1960s vintage C-5 Galaxy and the next day get into his small Regional Jet.

I have been trained and qualified to fly E-110 (turboprop), DC-9, MD-80 Series, Fokker 100 and B-737, but I only hold an FAA Type Rating in a 737. That is 'typed' onto my Airline Transport Pilot License.

When an airline gets a new 'model' of say the 737, they don't have to re-do all 737 Training again, but will normally be issued a "Differences" package. Nowadays, that's either an online thing or for his iPad to learn from at home. Maybe the pilot has one day of Ground School. Going from the -700 to the Max, I'd bet that there might have been some Sim time too.

In the late 80s at Midway, we flew the -200 Advanced Series of the 737. I was lucky enough to have picked up a new one right from Boeing Field! I made the fifth landing in that jet after we ferried it back to Miami! That was one fun three-day weekend!

Back at Midway around 1990, we leased an older -100 series 737 for a short period. We all got a Differences sheet on the plane. It had the same basic engines but a less powerful version. That might have meant that for that engine, the Max Start EGT might have been 550C degrees where our regular engines might have had a Max EGT of 575C degrees. That and probably a lower Max Fuel Quantity (smaller tanks) and a few other 'Differences' and we were now 'trained' and 'legal' to fly that one 737.

But the FAA said WAIT! All pilots MUST also be 'trained' and demonstrate knowledge and experience in the deployment and retraction of the additional set of Aft Air Stairs located near the tail on an Aft Entry Door of this one particular aircraft!

We had a plane swap at Midway one morning and 30 minutes before departure I'm in the back of that goofy plane with a F/A showing me how to work the big handle to the air stairs! I pull the handle down and out plops the stairs, right in front of the big window at the gate! I retract them and I'm now 'trained'! I then have to call the Company from the cockpit on our VHF Company Freq (131.32........ can't believe I still remember!) and tell them that F/O Gary M is now 'trained' on N709ML! And then we started boarding the passengers! But I was Legal for the FAA......................

Last edited by Gary M; 03-21-2019 at 09:40 AM.
Gary M is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:49 AM
  #191  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 223
Default

Originally Posted by Kendall View Post
MCAS is activated causing the plane to nose down AND YET the pilots are not even aware of it, no visual or audio warning!
Ever heard of the old saying of "Flying by the seat of their pants"?

My ASS was always one of the best 'warning' and/or 'sensors' in the cockpit! Even today, sitting in the back, I can still 'feel' every turn and almost every gentle change in the flight. Right in my ass........
Gary M is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:42 AM
  #192  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Posts: 4,922
Default

Originally Posted by Gary M View Post
Ever heard of the old saying of "Flying by the seat of their pants"?

My ASS was always one of the best 'warning' and/or 'sensors' in the cockpit! Even today, sitting in the back, I can still 'feel' every turn and almost every gentle change in the flight. Right in my ass........
While I mostly agree with you, In my experience, as planes get bigger, faster, and more automated and especially once you get to hydraulic controls(artificial or little to no control feedback) reliance on the instruments is far more crucial than that of seat of pants stuff. This and seat of pants has proven to work really poorly in IMC.

Just my opinion.
ndb8fxe is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:50 AM
  #193  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by ndb8fxe View Post
While I mostly agree with you, In my experience, as planes get bigger, faster, and more automated and especially once you get to hydraulic controls(artificial or little to no control feedback) reliance on the instruments is far more crucial than that of seat of pants stuff. This and seat of pants has proven to work really poorly in IMC.

Just my opinion.
I think the "seat of your pants" just gets your attention, which then causes you to use the instruments or anything else you have available (hearing, eyesight, etc) to determine what's going on and what to do about it. It's a bit easier VFR though.
km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 12:19 PM
  #194  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,894
Default

Originally Posted by km1125 View Post
As has been pointed out **numerous** times before, "runaway trim" IS a condition that pilots have to periodically deal with, for a number of reasons. There IS a procedure to do this and it appears neither of these flights followed that (although we don't have all the facts in yet).

I'm just shocked that it couldnt be disabled in an easier way!
MUHSFINK07 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 01:03 PM
  #195  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: North NJ
Posts: 640
Default

Originally Posted by MUHSFINK07 View Post
I'm just shocked that it couldnt be disabled in an easier way!
It is EASY to disable, two switches, right there by the throttle. Then a circuit breaker is for some reason the switches were to have welded closed.
TurboJoe is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 01:14 PM
  #196  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,170
Default

A question for those knowledgeable about MCAS. This is mostly in reference to ProppedUp's post #114 on the Lion Air crash.

It appears MCAS is only active once the flaps are up. The pilot retracts the flaps, starts to experience runaway trim, and puts the flaps back down which briefly corrects the issue by disabling MCAS. Then they raise the flaps again and go through 6 minutes of battling runaway trim. Even if they didn't realize MCAS was the issue or know how to disable it, which given the previous flight's reliance on the jump seat pilot seems possible, why didn't they just put flaps down and return to the airport? Basically if they pulled the flaps up, things started going to crap for unknown reasons, then they put the flaps back down which solved things, why wasn't this tried again rather than battling runaway trim until the crash.

And the fact the plane was flying again after the previous flight experienced that issue with passengers aboard is mind boggling.
HurricaneBK is online now  
Old 03-21-2019, 01:16 PM
  #197  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by MUHSFINK07 View Post
I'm just shocked that it couldnt be disabled in an easier way!
Was that supposed to be in /sarc format, or have you not been reading this thread?
km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 01:40 PM
  #198  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by HurricaneBK View Post
It appears MCAS is only active once the flaps are up. The pilot retracts the flaps, starts to experience runaway trim, and puts the flaps back down which briefly corrects the issue by disabling MCAS. Then they raise the flaps again and go through 6 minutes of battling runaway trim. Even if they didn't realize MCAS was the issue or know how to disable it, which given the previous flight's reliance on the jump seat pilot seems possible, why didn't they just put flaps down and return to the airport?
Yep, I have that same question. Even just a little bit of flaps would have probably stabilized the craft, enough to make the ~6-10 min back to the airfield.

I have other questions too:









km1125 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:03 PM
  #199  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,331
Default

The Airbus no longer has in flight trim. You set the trim wheel for take off only. Then the fly by wire manages the flight controls once airborne eliminating the need for trim.

The new Airbus models have no trim wheel at all. Once the W&B data has been determined the trim is set for take off by the computers.

Gone are the days of flying airliners by seat of your pants. I have to fly on my days off for that.
The Revenge is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:19 PM
  #200  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Globetrottin, Earth
Posts: 938
Default

To a couple of your points. As I mentioned before the dirty little secret is this airplane has other auto trim modes and tries to help you trim. On takeoff you are accelerating so fast you need trim. It helps you.

Virtually the same thing MCAS is helping you to do to get out of a stall. In stall recovery you have a boatload of nose up trim in most of the time. If not to fly that slow would require full back pressure on the yoke. So when you recover you will need to roll forward trim for a while. A long while. So MCAS sensing a stall assist you it does it slowly. STS does the same thing. On departure the aircraft is trimmed for a slow speed say 150kts. Well pretty quickly your are going 250. STS comes in and helps.

STS operates most frequently during takeoffs, climb and go-arounds. Conditions for speed trim operation are listed below:•Airspeed between 100 KIAS andMach 0.5•10 seconds after takeoff •5 seconds following release of trim switches, flaps not up etc.

I do not think they are at full flaps. They probably departed with Flaps 5 (or maybe more 10 or 15) and he called for flaps 1 then up which is normal. Hence the step in the graph. Yes typically if you change configuration on an aircraft and something bad happens most of the it's a good idea to go back to where you were. Also he had a shaker going off the whole time as soon as he left the ground. It would seem apparent to me the first order of business would be to determine if we are flying and/or have suffecient speed to fly, If we do and are which would be apparent by cross checking the 3 airspeed indicators and the fact we are still accellerating hard and wind noise is getting loud (it gets quiet when you slow down). Once I determine yup we are flying and well past a stall envelope which will happen fast with 2 engines running I pull that shaker breaker as soon as we are up and away. It would be super super super annoying to fly this plane with the shaker going off. I have had this happen before as I mentioned and this is what we did (we were in cruise flight though).

Also note there is "flap handle position" and actual "flap position". We may be flying along with flaps selected 5 and indicating 5 for departure and I call for "flaps 1" and a few seconds later "flaps up" so the flap handle may go from flaps 5 to up in 5 sec or so but it will take the flaps much longer to fully retract. What is on the paper is flap handle position not actual flap position I think. So that may explain some of your descrepincy. Speed trim system works on actual position not selection so even though flap handle position is selected up STS may continue to operate until full retraction.

Flight Safety (which is a training company that trains mainly business jet crews) motto is THE BEST SAFETY DEVICE IN ANY AIRCRAFT IS A WELL TRAINED CREW


This sums up what is being parroted.... again

https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2019/march/20/congressman-concerned-about-foreign-pilot-training?utm_source=Editorial+737+Sam+Graves&utm_m edium=Faebook&fbclid=IwAR3XyOxunP6CmaTDShffPYc--49xaE8ZprmAGgsjjQF78yuRZW3X4HOG3CU
mikeloew likes this.

Last edited by ProppedUp; 03-21-2019 at 07:24 PM.
ProppedUp is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread