Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Dockside Chat
Reload this Page >

Commercial fishing case decided by Supreme Court

Notices

Commercial fishing case decided by Supreme Court

Old 02-25-2015, 02:33 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,243
Default Commercial fishing case decided by Supreme Court

Been following this story for a few years. The Supreme Court decided on this today. Very interesting
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...6ee_story.html
787337 is offline  
Old 02-25-2015, 04:01 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: N.E. CT
Posts: 2,620
Default

Hmm,.... Yes, interesting interpretation.
NedLloyd is offline  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:07 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,243
Default

Originally Posted by NedLloyd View Post
Hmm,.... Yes, interesting interpretation.
My wife who works on the side of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance in the business world felt that its use in this case was a stretch. I was just disappointed to see the guy get off scot free.
787337 is offline  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:19 PM
  #4  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,340
Default

Frankly, I am surprised it was a 5-4 decision.
Sarbanes-Oxley was meant to address a problem created in Enron, not as an alternative criminal system. Under traditional law, the fisherman would get 5 years for destroying evidence, while under Sarb-Ox it is 20 years.
LI32 is offline  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:20 PM
  #5  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,340
Default

Originally Posted by 787337 View Post
I was just disappointed to see the guy get off scot free.
He didn't, he was convicted under the regular federal evidence tampering law and sentenced to 27 months (5 years was the max) instead of up to 20 years.
LI32 is offline  
Old 02-25-2015, 08:39 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC/GA
Posts: 5,914
Default

Hope they took his boat ...
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 07:46 AM
  #7  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kenberma
Posts: 604
Default

Originally Posted by LI32 View Post
Frankly, I am surprised it was a 5-4 decision.
Sarbanes-Oxley was meant to address a problem created in Enron, not as an alternative criminal system. Under traditional law, the fisherman would get 5 years for destroying evidence, while under Sarb-Ox it is 20 years.
What about the little shit that threw out the marathon bombers backback, I would like to see him get 20 vs 5
blue33 is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 07:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mass.
Posts: 5,584
Default

Originally Posted by blue33 View Post
What about the little shit that threw out the marathon bombers backback, I would like to see him get 20 vs 5
According to news reports last night, he could walk..
On The Edge 1 is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 07:58 AM
  #9  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kenberma
Posts: 604
Default

Originally Posted by On The Edge 1 View Post
According to news reports last night, he could walk..
I didn't read the scutos case yet but I would hope that they bring into their analysis the crime that the evidence is going to be used for, i.e. mass murder (malum in se) vs small fish (malum prohibitum)
blue33 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread