Notices

Fat fingers!!!

Old 05-06-2010, 01:47 PM
  #1  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Bahamas
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Fat fingers!!!

there's talk that a Citi trader with fat fingers punched an electronic trade for sale of 16 BLN! shs instead of 16 mil... thus triggering todays selloff, elctronic trading of stop losses and exchnages to liquidate.

no bonus for him
Old 05-06-2010, 01:49 PM
  #2  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
bsmit24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 17,716
Likes: 0
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Are traders insured for such errors?
Old 05-06-2010, 01:54 PM
  #3  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Bahamas
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

a trader is not liable but his firm is.

the trader will get fired but i've never heard of insurance for a mistake. there's insurance against fraud but there's no fraud. it's just a simple human mistake. (with huge consequences..)
Old 05-06-2010, 02:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston, TX / Point Clear, AL
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pole View Post
a trader is not liable but his firm is.

the trader will get fired but i've never heard of insurance for a mistake. there's insurance against fraud but there's no fraud. it's just a simple human mistake. (with huge consequences..)

why fired? fat finger sold before the market dropped! could have bought them all back at a lower price and a profit
Old 05-06-2010, 02:19 PM
  #5  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Bahamas
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

not likely... if it was that easy we'd all be doing it

he still has to buy back the 15'984'000'000 shs that he's now short. he'd get slaughtered.
Old 05-06-2010, 04:08 PM
  #6  
tka
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 746
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I am not sure I buy the trader excuse yet.I have never worked in the business,but I would be surprised if there weren't limits in place as to what size orders the trader could conduct.Huge difference between 16mil and 16bil.I would guess it had more to do with europe and algo/high frequency trading.Curious to see what the final outcome will be.
Old 05-06-2010, 04:17 PM
  #7  
Senior Member Admiral's Club Member
 
vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ms, Gulf Coast
Posts: 5,954
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Dohh!!!
Old 05-07-2010, 07:23 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,770
Received 1,063 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pole View Post
there's talk that a Citi trader with fat fingers punched an electronic trade for sale of 16 BLN! shs instead of 16 mil... thus triggering todays selloff, elctronic trading of stop losses and exchnages to liquidate.

no bonus for him

If anyone believes that I'm sure Goldman has a nice new investment product with your name on it.
Old 05-07-2010, 07:37 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tka View Post
I am not sure I buy the trader excuse yet.I have never worked in the business,but I would be surprised if there weren't limits in place as to what size orders the trader could conduct.Huge difference between 16mil and 16bil.I would guess it had more to do with europe and algo/high frequency trading.Curious to see what the final outcome will be.
Probably right on all except the "limits in place" part, not really the case...
Old 05-07-2010, 08:30 AM
  #10  
tka
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 746
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Venture34 View Post
Probably right on all except the "limits in place" part, not really the case...
Interesting.I have always wondered what, if any,limits or constraints traders worked under.I would have assumed limits to prevent either an order entry mistake or to keep limits on risk individual traders pose to the firm.
Old 05-07-2010, 11:12 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
fidhhook54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Better to have Fat fingers, than to have slim Johnson...

Last edited by fidhhook54; 05-07-2010 at 11:41 AM.
Old 05-07-2010, 11:31 AM
  #12  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South East Pa
Posts: 9,561
Received 1,004 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

For a few seconds yesterday I was a millionaire

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.