Suzuki 300 Octane vs. Fuel Economy
#1
Senior Member

Thread Starter

Does anyone have any evidence that running a higher octane will yield better fuel economy? If so, by how much.
I just did two fill ups at a reasonably local marina for a total of about 200g - don't remember octane but was cheapest around for E-free. . For the most part I struggled to keep over 3mpg which is normally easy to achieve. Was it how I loaded the boat? Extra wind resistance? who knows but it did get me thinking about the above question.
Walmart just opened up 92 octane e-free. It is less than I can get e-free on the water but more than WaWA at 89 octane by 7-8%. All other things being the same, does it make sense to pay a few percent more for higher octane at Walmart vs. Wawa?
I just did two fill ups at a reasonably local marina for a total of about 200g - don't remember octane but was cheapest around for E-free. . For the most part I struggled to keep over 3mpg which is normally easy to achieve. Was it how I loaded the boat? Extra wind resistance? who knows but it did get me thinking about the above question.
Walmart just opened up 92 octane e-free. It is less than I can get e-free on the water but more than WaWA at 89 octane by 7-8%. All other things being the same, does it make sense to pay a few percent more for higher octane at Walmart vs. Wawa?
#2

Your outboard will get the same economy at the specified octane as any octane higher than specified. If you run lower than specified octane gas in your outboard you could see a slight decrease in economy. E10 vs non ethanol gas of the same octane will have a 2-3% mpg increase.
Likes:
#4
Admirals Club 


Your outboard will get the same economy at the specified octane as any octane higher than specified. If you run lower than specified octane gas in your outboard you could see a slight decrease in economy. E10 vs non ethanol gas of the same octane will have a 2-3% mpg increase.

#5
Admirals Club 


#6
Senior Member

Thread Starter

Did not realize they would not go into lean burn below 89 octane.....doesnt matter never run anything below that anyway.
#7
#8
Senior Member


Power is affected by the BTU content of the fuel. More btu's/lb. Gasoline has more btu/lb than Alcohols. Diesel has more than Gasoline. This affects mileage, or amount of energy/gal.
Summer gasoline has more btu's/gal than Winter blend. Winter blends have a higher blend of Light End compounds, made up of smaller Carbon molecules, which have a higher vapor pressure in cold weather, and your car will still run.
So yea, straight Gasoline yields more power than Alcohol blends, and Summer fuel has a bit more energy/lb than Winter blends.
#9
Senior Member

I can't find any reference to a knock sensor in the service manual or lean burn to octane relationship.
#10
Admirals Club 

#11
Admirals Club 


I can tell you this:
My DF300AP (2017). If I run 87 Octane E10 from the pump, my MPG goes down 10% compared to Rec90. I thought I was imaging it... but I have 100% verified it.
My DF300AP (2017). If I run 87 Octane E10 from the pump, my MPG goes down 10% compared to Rec90. I thought I was imaging it... but I have 100% verified it.
Likes:
#12
Senior Member

Makes perfect sense. Running lower than minimum recommended octane detunes your engine by way of knock sensor retarding the timing. I run only rec 90 or higher.
#13
Admirals Club 


Actually, IIRC the DF300AP is designed for 87 octane... so I do not believe it is a function of octane... it's a function of ethanol.
#14
Senior Member

Ethanol will absolutely reduce fuel economy. In tuner cars running E30-E85 there is usually 15-25% more fuel used vs 100 octane no E. (100 = E70 effective octane) Will the increased fuel efficiency offset the increase in cost with such a small amount? It's a toss up IMHO and I would just go with the cheapest ethanol free fuel for maintenance sake, octane above the rating of the motor won't do much of anything.
#15
Senior Member

No reference to a knock sensor in my Df300 service manual. Not shown in the exploded parts diagrams available online ( but are shown for the other engines).
#17
Senior Member

How do you define 'properly'? It's a good idea to have one but certainly not a necessity. Carbureted engines don't have them.
#18

we're talking apples and oranges here. E10 vs non-E, 87 octane vs 89+. Both E10 and lower octane affect performance. I run E10 b/c there are limited options for non-E where I am, and depending on where I get gas some docks have 89 only, some offer 87 or 92. I use 89 or higher as per my manual.
To the OPs question, it does not make sense to get 92 if you can get 89. NOW, if you mistakenly put in a tank of 87, then topping off w/ 92 will help.
To the OPs question, it does not make sense to get 92 if you can get 89. NOW, if you mistakenly put in a tank of 87, then topping off w/ 92 will help.
#19
Member

Carbureted engines are mechanically control. With pre set parameters and manual adjustment. ( Carb jet size and manual ignition timing advance controlled by throttle position as examples) Which works really well just not very efficient.
EFI engines are electronically controlled via computer ( ECU-ECM). The computer relies many sensors ( a knock sensor usually being one of them) to keep the engine running properly with optimum efficiency and performance.
#20
Junior Member

Your outboard will get the same economy at the specified octane as any octane higher than specified. If you run lower than specified octane gas in your outboard you could see a slight decrease in economy. E10 vs non ethanol gas of the same octane will have a 2-3% mpg increase.
Good to know.