Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum
Reload this Page >

Twin Suzuki DF350s to Yamaha 425s or even quad DF300s?

Notices
The Boating Forum

Twin Suzuki DF350s to Yamaha 425s or even quad DF300s?

Old 09-09-2020, 10:15 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Western WA
Posts: 2,633
Received 824 Likes on 514 Posts
Default Twin Suzuki DF350s to Yamaha 425s or even quad DF300s?

Ok, twin DF350s on a 34 x 12 (20,500#) catamaran just aren’t getting it done and there are serious questions about the reliability and durability of them. Honestly, the boat shouldn’t have ever been fitted with only 700hp, but that’s a totally different discussion. One blew up at 188 hours and last weekend a prop cracked at 390 hours (no sign of impact on any of the 6 blades on that motor). Piece of mind when running 70 miles offshore may be weaning.

So, options... the boat is equipped with the optimus/sea station package. There is a rear helm too.

Replace with twin Yamaha 425s That means a all new rigging, gauges, and maybe the sea station set up???

What about quad DF300s? Assuming the transom can handle the weight. It’s aluminum, so not overwhelming to reinforce if needed (for sure discuss wi5 the builder). Benefits are we can keep the rigging, gauges, etc. no redoing the dashes. Also, lots more redundancy if we smoke one or lose a prop (3 motors left).

I thought about 250s, as 1,000 hp is plenty. But why bother when 250s are the same weight?

just looking for ideas, just in case. How much room in each motor wheel would twin DF300s take? I’m assuming there’s enough room back there, but I don’t actually know how much space they need to fit. 12’ beam.

let em rip...
Old 09-10-2020, 05:09 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,503
Received 421 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

so the yammys weigh nearly 2000 lbs for the pair and four df300s weigh 2500. The power to weight ratio is hugely in favor of the quads. the simplicity of twins is nice but the performance reports I have read surprisingly dont show a substantial improvement over the 350s so thats not a great option. Quad 300 v8 mercs would be within 200 lbs of the 425s but substantially more in cost and not save any room. So yeah 1200 hp and the ability to run home on three should something happen would be a huge upgrade in performance.
Old 09-10-2020, 12:04 PM
  #3  
Senior Member Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 421
Received 233 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

4-300AP'S? keep some of your rigging/$/ & Optimus etc...or have you given up...

Edit - misread, thought you were considering F300's...We run15" wheels on ours

Last edited by MarkV; 09-10-2020 at 12:45 PM.
Old 09-10-2020, 12:19 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 840 Likes on 461 Posts
Default

The difference between DF300 and DF250 is solely the ECM module which feeds a bit more fuel into the 300 and allows it to spin a couple of hundred rpms faster at WOT. As far as I understand, practically *all* that extra 50Hp is at the very top end, in low- and mid-range rpms DF250 and DF300 perform identically.

I would check carefully if you have enough space for quads in the back. Also, the issue for the transom is not only handling the weight, but the thrust as well. A transom that was designed for 700Hp might not behave well with 1200Hp, even if the weight of the motors is not that different.
Old 09-10-2020, 12:50 PM
  #5  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Miami Shores, Fernandina Beach
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 94 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Doubt any 34’ boat that weighs 20,000lbs will ever perform very well. Most in that size range weigh closer to 10,000 than 20,0000
Old 09-10-2020, 12:55 PM
  #6  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tarpon Springs, FL
Posts: 8,293
Likes: 0
Received 3,967 Likes on 2,239 Posts
Default

Have you discussed this with the company who made and rigged the boat?
Old 09-10-2020, 01:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Western WA
Posts: 2,633
Received 824 Likes on 514 Posts
Default

The 350s push her 40mph (WOT) in the ocean, a little faster in the Sound. So, the current power seems just barely enough. Would be happy to cruise in the 35-40 mph range and not routinely rely on the higher rpm range.

If the owners lean more toward quads, it’ll be a chat between them and the builder. I’m trying to get outside input/experiences to help inform the boat owners. Build a list of pros and cons.
Old 09-10-2020, 02:48 PM
  #8  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
THT sponsor
 
Outboard Specialties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 2,226
Received 358 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

You could probably get into quad 300 zukes while keeping your steering and some rigging for less then converting to twin 425 yami's. I think the quad move is the better direction if the boat will handle it.
Old 09-10-2020, 02:51 PM
  #9  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,597
Received 1,192 Likes on 648 Posts
Default

If the Suzuki 350s blew under warranty would think there would be good will toward replacement with quads DF300s and come out much cheaper and better all the way around. If the boat can handle them.

To cruise at the speeds you are after, will need at least 1000hp on it and even then hull design will come into play.
Old 09-10-2020, 04:12 PM
  #10  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 486
Received 68 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Need to find out if she will hold quads without too much work. If so, go for it. Also, don’t know about up there but the mercs are quite a bit lighter, more powerful, more efficient, and close to the same price here.
Old 09-10-2020, 05:02 PM
  #11  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 633
Received 197 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

The 425 is a beast though. Lots of displacement, low end power. I’d consider quad Merc v8 300s before quad zuke. Pound for pound they’re great engines. Just went out of Venice on a 39 contender with trip 300s and they were very impressive.

Old 09-11-2020, 04:32 AM
  #12  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
THT sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 6,763
Received 2,318 Likes on 1,157 Posts
Default

Quad V8 Mercury 300s would be tough to beat with power:weight, fuel economy and smoothness. The V8 Verados have the larger cushiony motor mounts to keep NVH to an absolute minimum on the aluminum hull.
Old 09-11-2020, 09:22 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Western WA
Posts: 2,633
Received 824 Likes on 514 Posts
Default

Anybody know the minimum width a pair of 300s needs to fit on a transom?
Old 09-11-2020, 09:31 AM
  #14  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
Posts: 2,482
Received 81 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Take a serious look at the Merc's, I'm very impressed with them, and I don't say that easily as I wasn't a big merc fan. but that's old school mindset which is not good!
Old 09-11-2020, 11:03 AM
  #15  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 232
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

If you got budget and can do it go with the 300 v8 mercs. You have to check the weight requirements. I think the v8 mercs are 40lbs heavier than the 300 yams
Old 09-11-2020, 11:05 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 76 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Twin 7 Marine 626 HP should do it just fine...
No need for trips or quads

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.