Go Back  The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum
Reload this Page >

Pursuit Denali 2460 8.1L...should I stay big block?

Notices

Pursuit Denali 2460 8.1L...should I stay big block?

Old 06-12-2019, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
Default Pursuit Denali 2460 8.1L...should I stay big block?

Hello,

I bought a 1997 Pursuit Denali with a 8.1L with unknown engine problems. The unknowns are proving to be not a huge deal but now that we have half the engine out we have a few decisions to make. The 8.1L is an expensive engine for parts or a rebuild but I got an old school engine buddy on the project.

He's suggested just slapping a 5.7 in for a fraction of the cost of the 8.1 but I've had a few other buddies say the 5,000 lb boat with 4-5 people in 2-3ft waves on lake erie will be over taxed. I also see that 90% of these boats seemed to run the 5.7L. Of course another option would be a far cheaper 454ci.

I'm torn from wanting the fuel injection and slight economy with the big power when needed (and not having to re-pro expensive duo props) and going to a simpler (carb'd) and cheaper engine to maintenance in the long run.

Any useful comments are appreciated!
carboncow is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 07:33 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 2,569
Default

Your buddy is correct. 454 will not be as fast as you are now bit far better than a small block requiring all the marine parts to change.

The make a 383 stroker than would have maybe enough power but frankly I'd stay big block.

Back up one step. What exactly is wrong with the current engine? Finding that answer is step 1. Anything external to the engine itself will just transfer to any other engine. If the engine turns over and has good compression you can completely replace ignition and carb systems for way less than a motor change.
Jumpsummo is online now  
Old 06-12-2019, 08:10 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 286
Default

8.1 or stay home. They are tanks. I say fix it.
Bront Antwoord is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 10:32 AM
  #4  
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: M.Vineyard, MA
Posts: 14,067
Default

Perhaps consider a Crusader 6.0 L MPI at 370 hp? ( No distributor)
https://www.1800runsnew.com/crusader-engines/

But apparently Michiganmotorz still sells 8.1 L I/Bs. However, there have been so many water ingestion problems with the 8.1s I would avoid them.
TTaxi is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 2,569
Default

Originally Posted by TTaxi View Post
Perhaps consider a Crusader 6.0 L MPI at 370 hp? ( No distributor)
https://www.1800runsnew.com/crusader-engines/

But apparently Michiganmotorz still sells 8.1 L I/Bs. However, there have been so many water ingestion problems with the 8.1s I would avoid them.
The 8.1 is the same block as a 454, correct? Water ingestion would be from backing up at high speed or chopping the throttle and getting slapped with backwash. Flaps on the exhaust should stop both of these. Is it a poorly designed exhaust? Doesn't that same exhaust get used on the 454?
Jumpsummo is online now  
Old 06-12-2019, 11:05 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sandy Hook Area, NJ
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by Jumpsummo View Post
The 8.1 is the same block as a 454, correct? Water ingestion would be from backing up at high speed or chopping the throttle and getting slapped with backwash. Flaps on the exhaust should stop both of these. Is it a poorly designed exhaust? Doesn't that same exhaust get used on the 454?
Neither of those things cause the water ingestion problem in the 8.1's. The problem started occurring with a new cam grind to suite the new fuel injection systems. Water droplets are sucked back up the exhaust stream during low speed engine operation because of camshaft overlap issues. Most times, the water that is drawn in, causes the valve stems to seize in the guides. The results can be mild to catastrophic. Failures are most prevalent in salt water. Fresh water boats have a better track record with this. There is a shutdown procedure that helps prevent this. Running the engine for several minutes at 1500 rpm's before shutdown seems to dry things out in the combustion chamber and lessen these reversion issues.

I would get the 8.1 fixed. That boat is heavy and needs the torque that a 496 provides. If you are in a lake and follow the shutdown procedure, you will enjoy a good long engine life.
Fine Catch is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 03:39 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 2,569
Default

Thanks. I accept your explaination but that's a long way to draw water. Even from a proper elbow. Has to be serious fault in the exhaust design. Steam might come that far back at shutdown if water were pooling somewhere in a hot area is all I can figure.
Jumpsummo is online now  
Old 06-12-2019, 04:01 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 881
Default

I went from a 7.4Gi (310 hp) to a 5.7GXi (320 hp). The 7.4 broke hard at about 1500 hours. I never tore into it to find the cause.
I had 2300 hours on the 5.7 when I sold it. I never missed that 7.4 for a second.
The 5.7 is lighter. Provides more maintenance room in the engine area. Better on gas. Less torque and wear on the outdrive. Not long after the engine swap, I needed a new outdrive due to pitted gear sets.
I don't think giving up FI for carbs is what I would do. Achieving similar hp with a small block and saving 400 pounds is the way to go.
a7ewizard is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 04:11 PM
  #9  
Admirals ClubCaptains Club Member Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 6,479
Default

The 383 Stroker is a great option at 350 hp and a big flat torque curve. Itll turn more rpms to achieve the same speeds but with much less fuel burn. Weight savings and extra space are a bonus. MPI all day, its a very reliable system and going to a carb will be a big step backwards.
sundancekid is offline  
Old 06-12-2019, 04:32 PM
  #10  
Admirals Club Admiral's Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Falmouth, MA
Posts: 542
Default

Big blocks are rare in the 2460, as you said most came with a 5.7. If the 8.1 is not an easy fix Id ditch it an throw in a new 6.0 or 6.2. Pretty sure they can be had up to about 420hp which would be plenty for that boat. Did you get this boat in Wareham by chance?
cobia23 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread