The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Portsea Marine Australia
Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Trucks & Trailers

Notices

Random Quote: I will kill fish till it kills me
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2010, 08:54 AM
  #1    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 872
Default Ford 6.0

Guys, Just want to validate what I believe to be true. The 6.0 Powerstroke is a good reliable engine, but is bad on fuel...is this the general consensus?
jhendric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 09:12 AM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gulf Coast, Alabama
Posts: 10,177
Default

do a search on which model years you're interested in. early models were problematic and required a couple of expensive fixes. Later models were said to be much better.
__________________
Rick
Alabama's Gulf Coast
Chaparral 240 Signature (Sold)
bamaboy473 is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 02-16-2010, 09:49 AM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 696
Default

Your thinking of the 6.4. The 6.0 had it's issues on some of the early years but is generally fine for '05 & up as long as you don't run a tuner.
Cousin Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:27 AM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGERPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maui and SoCal
Posts: 6,767
Default

I don't that is quite right. The 7.3 is generally considered to be the most trouble free but was phased out in the middle of the 2003 model year. The first versions of the 6.0, the 2003/2004s have some mechanical issues. The 2005 and later engines are quite a bit better, but still are not beefy enough to accept hot rodding like the 7.3's.
My own experience is that the 6.0s give the best mileage of the group. The later engines, with the catalytic converters seem to get the worst mileage of all.

If you are planning to modify the engine or add a chip, you want the 7.3. They've been around for a long time, but the trucks they come in have a leaf spring front end. So, you'll be trading turning radius and ride for the beefy engine. Most 6.0's will be in coil spring front end trucks, so you'll have an engine that is happy if you leave it alone along with a better ride and turning radius.
__________________
Kern O.
kerno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:36 AM
  #5    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Default

I would not buy a 6.0 PSD in any year. I'm sure some are fine but I've seen too many that are turds. Get a Cummins (5.9), much more proven. My buddy just got rid of an '05 or '06 6.0 with 90k on it, been nothing but problems. He picked up an '06 Cummins and its a much better engine. Just my opinion.
rockyraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:50 AM
  #6    
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 67
Default

I just sold my late model 2004 F-250 with 6.0L as I downgraded to a new F-150. My 6.0L was trouble free and I bought it brand new. I used it to tow a 28' enclosed trailer when I was racing. I towed up and down the east coast. I loaded that trailer when I moved to AZ and then when I moved back to NC and I maxed out on a CAT scale at 19,980 lbs on the return trip. I still got 11-12 MPG with stiff winds through AZ, NM, and west TX. My truck was never in for warranty work and I did all the scheduled services myself. That 6.0L never skipped a beat.
However, there was some problems with the early 6.0Ls but many of those problems were owner induced when owners started adding after market programers trying for more Tq/HP. Some owners had EGR problems too, but all trucks will have a few issues I guess. Maybe I just got lucky as some others were just unlucky. I don't know.
For fuel milage, empty on the freeway, I would average 19-20 depending on how flat the roads were. The key was keeping the tach below 2K or 70 MPH. Once over 70, the tach is over 2K and the fuel milage drops quickly.
I wouldn't hesitate buying a 6.0L if you have some history of the previous owner. If it's a friend and you know they never added a programmer, super. If a programmer has been added and the motor still has the stock head bolts, I would steer clear.
Just my 2 cents as an owner for 6 years.
FastZR1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 11:17 AM
  #7    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 372
Default

Check out Powerstroke.org. Great forum with lots of info. 05 and up are great trucks.

Just remember, forums are for people who have issues (90% of the time). So you will here a lot about the negative, very little from the positive.

What it comes down to, pull the heads, get them decked, new head gaskets, ARP head studs, delete the EGR, and add a coolant filtration system and you will have a bullet proof truck.

I get 19-23MPG (city&hwy). And can tow 15000# all day long.
__________________
Yamaha Outboard Master Technician
USCG 50GT Master Captain

1993 Paramount 21, 225 OX66

2005 Ford F250 FX4 Powerstroke
crazy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 02:05 PM
  #8    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mechanicsville VA
Posts: 2,768
Default

My 07 6.0 has been great but used very little. Mileage is around 11-12 BUT.....90% of the miles have 15,000 behind a dually spinning 4.10 gears at 75 on the highway. Everything I do cuts into mileage!!!! Running 65 improves mileage greatly (15-17) but I just can't drive.....55!!! (sammy hagar "scream") LOL
t500hps is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 07:31 PM
  #9    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gaithersburg Md.
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyraider View Post
I would not buy a 6.0 PSD in any year. I'm sure some are fine but I've seen too many that are turds. Get a Cummins (5.9), much more proven. My buddy just got rid of an '05 or '06 6.0 with 90k on it, been nothing but problems. He picked up an '06 Cummins and its a much better engine. Just my opinion.
I agree with you that the 5.9 cummins is a much better engine than the 6.0. Unfortunately, almost everything else about a dodge is inferior. If you do decide to go with a cummins, its absolutely necessary to buy a manual, as the automatics have been a long standing weak point for dodge.

There are many problematic 6.0 trucks (especially 2003/2004 models). The 05-07 models are much better, but driveability issues still arise even in these years.
__________________

2008 Hydra Sport 23 Bay Bolt, 250 E-tec
2005 Ford F-250 Diesel
viperkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 06:45 AM
  #10    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 15
Default

I drive a 2005 6.0 early production f-550 for work and i can honestly say it is the biggest piece of crap engine ford has ever produced. the motor has had nemerous head gaskest and head replacements, nemerous turbo replacements,numerous egr system failures,numerous lowpressure oil pump replacements and i could go on and on!!!!! just from my experience i can honestly say look for an older 7.3 because they were bullett proof!
jeff leduc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 08:57 PM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Murrells Inlet, SC
Posts: 3,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff leduc View Post
I drive a 2005 6.0 early production f-550 for work and i can honestly say it is the biggest piece of crap engine ford has ever produced. the motor has had nemerous head gaskest and head replacements, nemerous turbo replacements,numerous egr system failures,numerous lowpressure oil pump replacements and i could go on and on!!!!! just from my experience i can honestly say look for an older 7.3 because they were bullett proof!

it sounds like you had a crappy tech. if done right, all the problems could have been fixed the first time around.

Stud the truck using ARP's and shaved/decked heads, delete EGR and replace oil cooler, and on 05's replace the STC fitting on the HPOP while everything is apart. install cooolant filter , run a SCT custom tune and have fun

sorry to hear about your problems but my only complaint with mine has been my fuel mileage isn't as high as I would like.
__________________
Hydra-Sports 2796 , Twin BRP Evinrude 250 DI's

Mako 161 Flats Boat Yamaha 90


jeffro22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 05:13 AM
  #12    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Amongst the FL fishies
Posts: 1,255
Default

2005 f250 6.0 105000 miles no defects. 15-17 mpg @ interstate speeds (75-85 mph) - yesterday from Atlanta to FL averaged 16.4. With a bed cover I've seen 18 on the highway.
airbrush is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 05:59 AM
  #13    
Bly
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: south jersey
Posts: 4,121
Default Is this statement a test of understanding Sarcasm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhendric View Post
Guys, Just want to validate what I believe to be true. The 6.0 Powerstroke is a good reliable engine, but is bad on fuel...is this the general consensus?
This has to be a test? The 6.0 is a POS with a bad fuel burn.
Bly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 06:45 AM
  #14    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bly View Post
This has to be a test? The 6.0 is a POS with a bad fuel burn.
My POS 6.0L has 173k and has only been to the shop 1 time that cost me $435.
dbric36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 07:40 AM
  #15    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Murrells Inlet, SC
Posts: 3,200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bly View Post
This has to be a test? The 6.0 is a POS with a bad fuel burn.
alot of the 6.0 problems were early on and got worse due to improper diagnosing and repair of the original problems, and poor maintance by the owner. from late 04 on the truck became much better, and by now the ealier builds have been correctly repaired. With some good tuning you can get close to 18mpg on the hwy out of the 6.0 and really good power. mine has been nothing but reliable with 140K on it, and IMO, is still the best looking truck out there, and has more cab room than the others too.

I just did studs, headgaskets, oil cooler and deleted EGR as precationary and the truck is running great and i have pretty close a to a bulletproof 6.0 now. The price you pick up a 6.0 for you can afford to do the 3-4 things needed to address the 6.0 weakpoints and still come out ahead. and there have been plenty of D-maxs and cummins with injectors, tranny issues, there are just soo many more ford 6.0's out there that you hear about the bad ones more often
__________________
Hydra-Sports 2796 , Twin BRP Evinrude 250 DI's

Mako 161 Flats Boat Yamaha 90


jeffro22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 07:51 AM
  #16    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by viperkiller View Post
I agree with you that the 5.9 cummins is a much better engine than the 6.0. Unfortunately, almost everything else about a dodge is inferior. If you do decide to go with a cummins, its absolutely necessary to buy a manual, as the automatics have been a long standing weak point for dodge.

There are many problematic 6.0 trucks (especially 2003/2004 models). The 05-07 models are much better, but driveability issues still arise even in these years.
I appreciate your insight but I'm not totally sold that everything besides the motor on the Dodge is inferior. I've seen plenty of crappy interiors where the screws had rattled out, windows quit working, etc... on the Fords. I bought a used '00 Dodge 3/4 ton Cummins and the interior is pretty darn solid, not perfect, but solid. I've seen Fords with plenty of interior/exterior problems too. I honestly believe its somewhat a wash as both have issues regarding all of their supporting components. I would say the key is to find one that was taken care of and not ragged out, regardless of brand.

I believe the Dodge autos have gotten better in later years but your right, the older autos were known to be somewhat weak. I'm not even so sure that its that they were weak, maybe more that were not overengineered enough to stand the abuse from aftermarket programmers and such. I believe that if you stick with a stock truck, keep the tranny fluids serviced, and don't rag it out, you can probably get 200k out of the 47re more times than not. Most guys slap a programmer in that addes 100+ horse and 150 or more ft lbs of torque and then rag on it non stop just to see the black smoke billowing from the exhaust. Then they wonder why they burned up the stock tranny and call it a POS. They are asking the transmission to do things that they were not designed to do which is somewhat unfair when you look at it objectively.

Either way, I would stay away fromt he 6.0 unless you want to drop several thousand extra dollars trying to make it reliable. They are not all bad but I've seen too many that were real problems for me to ever consider buying one. Good luck to you.
rockyraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 07:53 AM
  #17    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffro22 View Post
alot of the 6.0 problems were early on and got worse due to improper diagnosing and repair of the original problems, and poor maintance by the owner. from late 04 on the truck became much better, and by now the ealier builds have been correctly repaired. With some good tuning you can get close to 18mpg on the hwy out of the 6.0 and really good power. mine has been nothing but reliable with 140K on it, and IMO, is still the best looking truck out there, and has more cab room than the others too.

I just did studs, headgaskets, oil cooler and deleted EGR as precationary and the truck is running great and i have pretty close a to a bulletproof 6.0 now. The price you pick up a 6.0 for you can afford to do the 3-4 things needed to address the 6.0 weakpoints and still come out ahead. and there have been plenty of D-maxs and cummins with injectors, tranny issues, there are just soo many more ford 6.0's out there that you hear about the bad ones more often
Some very valid points here.
rockyraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 08:12 AM
  #18    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 210
Default

I would stay away from the 6.0. I had two and they both had issues, one fairly minor things and the other more serious. I have a 6.4 now and no problems, and a lot quiter.
aquasition is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:51 PM
  #19    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 172
Default

what year are you looking at in the 6.0l?
__________________
Salt Treated Sport Fishing
WAHOO123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 03:19 PM
  #20    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 480
Default

I have a 2005 F-250 Harley Davidson with the 6.0 and it has 80000 miles on it, runs great, I am a kind of guy that will run it up to 3000 rpm's off a light and watch the black smoke go all over the place for fun, so I can't comment on the mileage because I get terrible
pmurray633 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0