Quote:
Originally Posted by denny-o
Ya know, if one these witches brews actually did what they claim, do you not think that EXXON, which has more money than god, would be exclusively licensing it, putting it in their gas, and trumpeting their advantage over the competition to the heavens in advertising?
Well, they have not and they don't...
denny-o
|
That's because they already do!
Of course, our gasolines have had very effective detergents for several decades. And, because detergent additives help maintain an engine's emission performance, the EPA has required a minimum dosage in all gasolines since 1995. So, while all gasolines now contain detergents, all our gasolines contain additional quantities to better guarantee fuel system cleanliness.
http://www.exxon.com/USA-English/GFM...soline_FAQ.asp
But it costs money and eats into profits. Oil companies add the minimum detergents or as in the case of Exxon just over the minimum required by the EPA so they can toot their horn. Do you really think they could add the decarb cleaners that help to breakdown the carbon desposits and still keep already skyrocketing gas prices competitive?

Adding the minimum keeps costs down and those record profits rolling in.
I guess Exxon is pulling one over on the EPA with their "witches brew."
OH wait, I forgot about Techron and RingFree made by Chevron and I think there are a few others. Does the fact that they are made by an oil company give them any credibility? So much for that theory...
BTW, IMO using Sea Foam when burning e-10 fuel is a TERRIBLE idea.