The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Portsea Marine Australia
Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Trucks & Trailers

Notices

Random Quote: Follow me as I go fishing around the world or at least get my boat out of the driveway.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-25-2009, 06:58 PM
  #1    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: on the bulkhead
Posts: 1,772
Default Just bought a Tundra

Traded in my 2006 Tundra for 2010 with a 5.7. Dont do a lot of towing but just loved the power of the 5.7. I was wrestling with buying a Ford, I really liked the vehicle and the deals with Ford were really good. Ford has come a long way and is definintely a force to be reconed with. But in the end the Toyota just kept comming back to me.
__________________
2006 Contender 23T
275 Verado
Nicmegmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 07:01 PM
  #2    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Masaryktown, Fla.
Posts: 5,387
Default

84k on our 04 Tundra. Gas, oil tires and brakes. Can't ask or much more than that.....
__________________
America - we're different, by design. Big Al
triumphrick is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-25-2009, 07:16 PM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 1,943
Default

Matt- Sounds like a nice truck. Did you go with an access cab or crew? Even though you just bought it, do you know what kind of mileage your getting? Please post a pic if you can. Next vehicle I am leaning towards a Tacoma but will check out the Tundra.
__________________
Chris
bstnsportsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 07:26 PM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 1,305
Default

Its an awsome truck, the power is unreal. And the best part is the brakes, no more being pushed around by the boat.
Attached Images
   
__________________
TripleCrownNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 09:27 PM
  #5    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ?
Posts: 1,421
Default

I may be gettting one this week. Getting rid of a '05 F150 supercrew and leaning toward a Dbl cab 4X4 Tundra. I wrestled with going with a Duramax GMC, but the Tundra makes the most sense. The smog stuff on the new Diesels is steering my decision.
__________________
20' SeaCraft MA
14.5 Scout SF
gary240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 10:22 PM
  #6    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver Island Canada
Posts: 977
Send a message via MSN to nedarb2
Default

Just got a 2010 yesterday for a new sales guy at work with the 4.6

NOT impressed with the truck as a whole, in the speaking of user friendly design- we bought it becasue it was cheap, and has the reputation to be low cost to keep running, and we expect it to be great for what it was bought for, and hold up the toyota reputation.
However, some small things are really a piss off, and I would never get one for a personal truck, and am glad i didnt buy it for myself. I am tall in the low 6' range, and it feels like im staring out the sun visor. The truck feels more like my ford escape for power, granted we dont have the 5.7, but still, it doesnt feel liek the power a truck should have, especially when they are comparing it to a 5.7 chevy as equal power with their 4.6.
the dashboard clock feels 10' away, and is hard to see and read from the drivers seat, and the radio is almost impossible to read the screen, its got a high-glare screen in any light, and is very hard to read, and from such a sharp angle its even harder to see, its almost like they angled the whole center console to the passengers seat.
Another thing, is all the gauges in the dash are down these little tube things, so you have to look down like a scope thats 6'' deep to see every different gauge - very irritating and hard to do, especially when your in a hurry.

I think toyota is on the right track, the brakes ARE very outstanding, but small things like a driver friendly dash and controls are still needing tweeking. But then agian, it was not bought to be driver friendly, it was bought to be a dependable vehicle thats going to get alot of miles.
nedarb2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 10:50 PM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: nanaimo, bc, canada
Posts: 2,005
Default

why would you go for the 4.6 and not the 5.7? The fuel consumption is very minimal and if used any for towing the 5.7 will likely be better on fuel.
i'm happy with my 07 Tundra 4x4 Dbl Cab TRD with 5.7 v8, but like most half ton truck it came with P-rated tires which i swapped to LT's.
__________________
tight lines and sore arms
bc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 03:53 AM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 1,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nedarb2 View Post
Just got a 2010 yesterday for a new sales guy at work with the 4.6

NOT impressed with the truck as a whole, in the speaking of user friendly design- we bought it becasue it was cheap, and has the reputation to be low cost to keep running, and we expect it to be great for what it was bought for, and hold up the toyota reputation.
However, some small things are really a piss off, and I would never get one for a personal truck, and am glad i didnt buy it for myself. I am tall in the low 6' range, and it feels like im staring out the sun visor. The truck feels more like my ford escape for power, granted we dont have the 5.7, but still, it doesnt feel liek the power a truck should have, especially when they are comparing it to a 5.7 chevy as equal power with their 4.6.
the dashboard clock feels 10' away, and is hard to see and read from the drivers seat, and the radio is almost impossible to read the screen, its got a high-glare screen in any light, and is very hard to read, and from such a sharp angle its even harder to see, its almost like they angled the whole center console to the passengers seat.
Another thing, is all the gauges in the dash are down these little tube things, so you have to look down like a scope thats 6'' deep to see every different gauge - very irritating and hard to do, especially when your in a hurry.

I think toyota is on the right track, the brakes ARE very outstanding, but small things like a driver friendly dash and controls are still needing tweeking. But then agian, it was not bought to be driver friendly, it was bought to be a dependable vehicle thats going to get alot of miles.

You are completely out to lunch on this. No power??? What a joke. My Tundra will out pull ANYTHING in its class. Sounds to me like you have an axe to grind over somethng.
__________________
TripleCrownNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 04:37 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: on the bulkhead
Posts: 1,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bstnsportsfan View Post
Matt- Sounds like a nice truck. Did you go with an access cab or crew? Even though you just bought it, do you know what kind of mileage your getting? Please post a pic if you can. Next vehicle I am leaning towards a Tacoma but will check out the Tundra.
I have not picked it up yet. A bought the double cab. The crew max was nice ...almost a limosine size back seat...but it makes the bed pretty small. Think I got a good deal.
__________________
2006 Contender 23T
275 Verado
Nicmegmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 04:48 AM
  #10    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: on the bulkhead
Posts: 1,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nedarb2 View Post
The truck feels more like my ford escape for power, granted we dont have the 5.7, but still, it doesnt feel liek the power a truck should have, especially when they are comparing it to a 5.7 chevy as equal power with their 4.6.
Wow I am surprised. I almost bought the 4.6. I test drove the 5.4 Ford and the 5.7 Chevy. I thought the 4.6 Toy had more power than the Ford and Chevy.


But the 5.7 Toy is amazing.
__________________
2006 Contender 23T
275 Verado
Nicmegmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 05:31 AM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Upper Chesapeake Bay
Posts: 7,357
Default

Nicmegmatt,
Did you do a cash for clunkers?
If you don't mind, what was the final number out the door?
Nice truck, no doubt! Congrats.
Jeff
240 LTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 07:39 AM
  #12    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: on the bulkhead
Posts: 1,772
Default

MSRP 36057 Its hard to figure exactly because I traded in a 2006 Tundra. If you use kbb trade in value of 14500 for my trade I paid just about 30k even.

No I did not have a clunker to trade.
__________________
2006 Contender 23T
275 Verado
Nicmegmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 09:43 AM
  #13    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 3,176
Default

Awesome truck!
I've an 04 AC, 4.7L/4WD/TRD/TOW with almost 96,000 miles on it since new and would love the GenII Tundra 5.7L if I could get any other truck. It is hard to justify yet as it does everything so very well.

I would get the same truck, if not in black, 5.7, SR5 or Limitied and TRD/Tow.

What boat are you towing with it?
thundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:52 AM
  #14    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 251
Default

Nice truck. Just went thru this analysis myself. Yesterday, I ordered a 2010 F 150. Yes, the Toy engine is really great, but overall I thought the Ford a better engineering truck and better interior. Tough call though. Ford will soon upgrade its engine (due for one) so I may trade in a few years. Good luck with the truck -- nothing beats a new one!
Elbow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 01:48 PM
  #15    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: mandeville, la
Posts: 572
Default

I have an 07 I bought new 2 yrs this month. I have 31k miles on it and could not be happier. The truck has not been back to the dealer since the day I bought her. The only thing done so far were oil and filter and air filter changes. The tires even still look new. If something happened to my truck today I would not hesitate to get another Toyota tommorrow. The only thing I would do different is the color.
daveinthewave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 02:34 PM
  #16    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 3,228
Default

I am signing the papers to order a crewmax on Saturday, the crewmax trucks are pretty hard to find and I had to have white.
__________________
'05 Pacific 1925
MacCTD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 02:42 PM
  #17    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Beach Gardens/Port Orange, Fl.
Posts: 1,350
Default

I just want to correct the misinformation about the engine size.. It is 4.7, not a 4.6.. Also, I dont believe there is a GM 5.7l engine in their trucks.. It is 4.8/5.3/6.0.

Anyways, even if Gm had a 5.7, it wouldn't be a fair comparison.. It does(Toyota's 4.7) , however, compare to Gm's 5.3 in terms of performance.. I have driven both and own one..
Troutman561 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 02:46 PM
  #18    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 3,228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troutman561 View Post
I just want to correct the misinformation about the engine size.. It is 4.7, not a 4.6.. Also, I dont believe there is a GM 5.7l engine in their trucks.. It is 4.8/5.3/6.0.

Anyways, even if Gm had a 5.7, it wouldn't be a fair comparison.. It does(Toyota's 4.7) , however, compare to Gm's 5.3 in terms of performance.. I have driven both and own one..

Actually the current Tundra V8 engines are the 4.6L and the 5.7L
__________________
'05 Pacific 1925
MacCTD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 03:00 PM
  #19    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Beach Gardens/Port Orange, Fl.
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCTD View Post
Actually the current Tundra V8 engines are the 4.6L and the 5.7L

Wow, your right... I stand corrected.. When did this happen?? I have a 4.7 in my 01...
Troutman561 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 04:02 PM
  #20    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
Posts: 723
Default

The 4.6 is new for 2010 model Tundras. I think that the same engine will be used is other Toyota and Lexus models.

The 4.7 was in the first generation Tundras. I have a 2004 Tundra with the 4.7.
__________________
18' Jones Brothers with Yam F115
capt_matt is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4.7L Tundra, 2x4, 240 LTS Trucks & Trailers 48 01-24-2009 05:57 PM
Towing with a Tundra gradytoo The Boating Forum 43 05-10-2008 06:04 PM
New Tundra GWNORTH Dockside Chat 7 02-06-2007 04:33 PM
Bought new tundra, Now the bad news. high life Dockside Chat 30 01-29-2007 09:07 AM
06 tundra towing doug828 The Boating Forum 0 02-24-2006 12:50 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0