The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > PRODUCTS > Shipyard Isl. Marine Engine Parts

Notices

Random Quote: A bad day Fishin, is better than a good day at work.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2007, 05:05 PM
  #1    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bridgeport,Ct.
Posts: 552
Default deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Today I went to replace my original deep cycle batteries and the Yamaha tech on duty told me Yamaha was not recommending deep cycles for my 225F Yamaha. He stated it was "straight from Yamaha". He said you need a cranking battery and gave me an 100 CCA batttery. Is this true?
capt.nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 06:56 PM
  #2    
SIM
Senior MemberVendorCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington Island,Wi USA
Posts: 11,407
Send a message via AIM to SIM
Default RE: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Nick,

Out of the 2004 Yamaha rigging guide page 4-4 under recommended F200-F225 battery specifications.................verbatim(that is a BIG word for me btw) [img]../images/emoticons/biggrin.gif[/img]

CCA Rating(Cold cranking amps) min512

MCA Rating(Marine cranking amps) min 675

RC Minutes(reserve capacity inminutes @ 25 amps) 182

Yamaha recommends a Cranking type battery that can have distilled water added to it cells when necessary. Dual purpose CrankingDeep cycle batteries can be used if they meet the above spec and water can be added to the cells. Do not use maintenance free or Gel Cell batteries since they may not be compatible with Yamaha engines charging system.

Andy
__________________
Andy Munao
Our new parts site: www.simyamaha.com
Yamaha Outboard Sales, Parts and Service
1-800-213-3323 parts@shipyardisland.com
Click the logo to see our THT Vendor Forum
SIM is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 03-20-2007, 07:27 PM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bridgeport,Ct.
Posts: 552
Default RE: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Sim,
Thanks for the quick reply and good info. (as usual) Obviously that 100 CCA was a typo. (meant 1000)
capt.nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 08:40 AM
  #4    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeast Mass
Posts: 164
Default Re: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Now would that apply to all Yammies? My 2003 OX66 200hp came with two dual purpose Exide Nautilus NC-27's
MCA=730 RC=160, no way to add water. Is this an issue? That's what the dealer installed.

Fishegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 11:35 AM
  #5    
SIM
Senior MemberVendorCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington Island,Wi USA
Posts: 11,407
Send a message via AIM to SIM
Default Re: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Fish,

Personally I would not use a wet cell battery that I could not properly maintain (water check). But that is just me.......

Andy
__________________
Andy Munao
Our new parts site: www.simyamaha.com
Yamaha Outboard Sales, Parts and Service
1-800-213-3323 parts@shipyardisland.com
Click the logo to see our THT Vendor Forum
SIM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 12:34 AM
  #6    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Galveston, Texas
Posts: 1,116
Default Re: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Quote:
SIM - 3/21/2007 9:35 AM



Fish,

Personally I would not use a wet cell battery that I could not properly maintain (water check). But that is just me.......

Andy
So AGM's are out of the question?
rotordriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 10:37 AM
  #7    
SIM
Senior MemberVendorCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington Island,Wi USA
Posts: 11,407
Send a message via AIM to SIM
Default Re: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Quote:
rotordriver - 3/21/2007 10:34 PM
Quote:
SIM - 3/21/2007 9:35 AM

Fish,

Personally I would not use a wet cell battery that I could not properly maintain (water check). But that is just me.......

Andy
So AGM's are out of the question?
That is not what I posted.......if I was using a wet cell battery it would be of the type that I could maintain.

I have personally and I also know of several Yamaha owners that have used AGM's with great success and have had no issues. I would not use a Gell cell though.

Andy
__________________
Andy Munao
Our new parts site: www.simyamaha.com
Yamaha Outboard Sales, Parts and Service
1-800-213-3323 parts@shipyardisland.com
Click the logo to see our THT Vendor Forum
SIM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 01:36 PM
  #8    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeast Mass
Posts: 164
Default Re: deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries

Well they're going on 4 years old so I'll keep that in mind when I go to replace them, as always Andy, thank you
Fishegg is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deep Cycle vs Cranking Batteries!! Chago The Boating Forum 14 04-16-2007 12:24 PM
deep cycle batteries vs. cranking batteries capt.nick The Boating Forum 2 03-20-2007 05:39 PM
Deep cell and cranking batteries kpcnj The Boating Forum 8 02-03-2007 08:16 PM
Deep cycle batteries LAbay The Boating Forum 8 07-04-2006 11:41 PM
Deep Cycle/Cranking Batteries Ray KSUSA3 The Boating Forum 11 05-02-2005 09:10 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0