Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeper
There are two interesting points I see after reading this law closely.
1. It says if you hold a federal NMFS recreational license you are exempt. I guess that means a HMS recreational? I don't know why they put that in there.
2. The reciprosity part where an out of state fisherman does not need a RI license if the state he is from allows RI licensed fisherman to fish in that state. It would be good if all the NE states put that in the language because you know they are all going to go with license requirements.
|
I think the "Federal Rec. Permit" is a different beast than the hms permit. The feds were always planning on having a permit, which should be free until 2011 or 2012, and after that they will charge for it.
So presumably we can just get the free fed permit for the first couple of years.
Second, the "fine" print in these licenses is that you have to have a residents permit to get reciprocity. So I can't get a nonresident RI permit and use that for reciprocity in NY and CT. I can probably get a resident MA permit and that should have reciprocity with RI though. But probably not NY or CT.
Even so, NY is only granting localized reciprocity to other states. CT only gets long island sound and fishers island, but not montauk or the south beaches. I'm not sure what RI would get, but it's probably just fishers island.
All in all, RI's bill is much more fisherman friendly than either CT or NY. They thought it through and took all of the issues into consideration, and they really did consult with SW anglers (as opposed to CT which was largely driven by the freshwater anglers).