The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > REGIONAL BOATING & FISHING GROUPS > Northeast

Notices

Random Quote: A bad day on the water is still better than a good day at work...(:
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2008, 01:44 PM
  #1    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Little Egg Hbr. NJ
Posts: 119
Default Pots Off The Reef Bill

I hope it's not to late to rally the troops. NJ anglers/boater need to flood the office of Assemblyma Joe Roberts to force them to post Assembly Bill A3986 for a vote first thing on Monday. This bill if signed into lay would not allow commercial gear to be used on NJ's artificial reefs. These reefs were paid for through contributions ect by recreational fishermen and boaters as well as divers. The use of the gear the comms are useing/losing on the reefs are having a devistating effect on them as well as the fish population that inhabite them. Pleae call Ass. Joe Roberts at 856 742 7600 and urge hime to post this bill for a vote, leave a call back number and demand a return call from his office. If it's not post on Monday it will die and we're goning to have to start all over nest yr. It has already passed the senate 30 to 0, so if we get it passed then it's on to the Gov office.
Marshmist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:30 AM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Little Egg Hbr. NJ
Posts: 119
Default RE: Pots Off The Reef Bill

Come on guys time is ticking. If you have any questions about don't hesitate to ask.
Marshmist is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 01-06-2008, 02:08 PM
  #3    
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cape Cod/Volusia County
Posts: 691
Default The "gives us all the fish" bill?

I hope this backfires in your faces.....

flippin recreational crybabies.



We'll see how happy you are after this:

State facing fishing ban on tautog

Quote:

"Normally, if we inspect 100 guys in every other fishery, you find a 4to 10 percent non-compliance rate. Tog is totally out of control. It'supwards of 30 to 35 percent," said New Jersey Marine EnforcementOfficer Joseph Meyer.

In one bust, a boat had 39 tog and 29 of them were in violation. Tog, aslow growing fish that takes almost a decade to reach sexual maturity,must be 14 inches to keep. The bag limit varies by season.

O'Shea last April expressed concern about "illegal, unreported andunregulated" fishing for tautog in New Jersey. He noted law-enforcementcases showed a noncompliance rate of close to 40 percent, and much ofthe live fish market was being supplied by recreational vessels.

"Obviously, the success of any effort to curb the illegal tautogfishery will depend on changing the compliance rate of recreationalanglers, as well as encouraging law-abiding harvesters to reportillegal activities," O'Shea said.

Commercial fishermen have been in compliance and are upset that a moratorium would also stop them from fishing.

"The commercial fishery is willing to take a reduction if it means nofishery at all," said Greg DiDomenico, of the Garden State SeafoodAssociation.
loligo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 02:10 PM
  #4    
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cape Cod/Volusia County
Posts: 691
Default The "gives us all the fish" bill?

I hope this backfires in your faces.....

flippin recreational crybabies.



We'll see how happy you are after this:

State facing fishing ban on tautog

Quote:

"Normally, if we inspect 100 guys in every other fishery, you find a 4to 10 percent non-compliance rate. Tog is totally out of control. It's upwards of 30 to 35 percent," said New Jersey Marine EnforcementOfficer Joseph Meyer.

In one bust, a boat had 39 tog and 29 of them were in violation. Tog, a slow growing fish that takes almost a decade to reach sexual maturity,must be 14 inches to keep. The bag limit varies by season.

O'Shea last April expressed concern about "illegal, unreported and unregulated" fishing for tautog in New Jersey. He noted law-enforcement cases showed a noncompliance rate of close to 40 percent, and much ofthe live fish market was being supplied by recreational vessels.

"Obviously, the success of any effort to curb the illegal tautog fishery will depend on changing the compliance rate of recreational anglers, as well as encouraging law-abiding harvesters to reportillegal activities," O'Shea said.

Commercial fishermen have been in compliance and are upset that a moratorium would also stop them from fishing.

"The commercial fishery is willing to take a reduction if it means no fishery at all," said Greg DiDomenico, of the Garden State SeafoodAssociation.
loligo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 07:07 PM
  #5    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 1984 35 Bertram NJ
Posts: 4,462
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

I sent an email to my assembly men Dec. 26th. I have not gotten a rely on their positions. If your assembly person does not act or take a position before the posting. Do not vote for them when they come up for reelection. If the bill is not posted it will die. Looks like the cheap way they can let things go on as usual Your man or women can say " I would have voted for the ban if it had just come up for vote'.
CB Haws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 04:32 AM
  #6    
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cape Cod/Volusia County
Posts: 691
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

sorry about the 2x post...it's this site...hangs a lot...why I don't come here much.....takes forever to post sometimes...
I don't know if it's the DB software this place uses or lack of bandwidth?
loligo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 11:57 AM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cape Cod, Ma
Posts: 258
Default RE: Pots Off The Reef Bill

What a bunch of cry babys in new jersey
Jon G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:54 PM
  #8    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central coastal NJ
Posts: 196
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

I, for one, have a RECREATIONAL lobster permit, not a commercial. The recreational lobster fisherman are only allowed 10 traps maximum, and they can't be more than 3 miles off shore. Anybody can get one, but you really need a hydraulic/electric pot hauler to check your line. Since the bill targets commercial potters, there will still be recreational lobster pots on the reefs, but probably a lot less total pots. Fisherman will need to respect the flags/pots, because the recreational guys will be on the reef legally.
animalpharm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:40 PM
  #9    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 500
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

ehhhh what can you do.........guess its going to be a really good dive season........anyone want some lobsters
__________________
tommymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 06:29 PM
  #10    
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cape Cod/Volusia County
Posts: 691
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

They did not call it up for a vote today, did they?
loligo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 05:58 AM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hewitt & Forked River, NJ
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

While this is a good start, it really doesn't affect the majority of the reefs. It can only keep the pots off of the reefs within 3 miles of shore in NJ waters. That is a total of 2 out of I believe 11 reef sites.
ReelNauti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 06:34 AM
  #12    
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cape Cod/Volusia County
Posts: 691
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

Quote:
ReelNauti - 1/8/2008 4:58 AMWhile this is a good start, it really doesn't affect the majority of the reefs. It can only keep the pots off of the reefs within 3 miles of shore in NJ waters. That is a total of 2 out of I believe 11 reef sites.


This is no start....it failed.....



The bill wasn't voted on yesterday, so that means it is on hold till?
loligo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 05:06 PM
  #13    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Little Egg Hbr. NJ
Posts: 119
Default Re: Pots Off The Reef Bill

We have to start all over again in the next session of the legislature.
Marshmist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 08:45 PM
  #14    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 27
Default RE: Pots Off The Reef Bill

Why not a compromise and push for a trap reduction scheme for the reef. Instead of an all out ban on commercial gear on the reef. Or setting on evens and halves on td loran lines giving loads of room between sets. Maybe your issue could be resolved without the state.
chucketzel is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lobster pots... HOPFFC2003 SportFishing and Charters Forum 6 08-25-2008 07:41 PM
DMR Uses "Reef Balls" for Artificial Reef QuadCity Gulf Coast 1 07-20-2008 10:46 PM
Lobster Pots motormayhem SportFishing and Charters Forum 8 07-07-2008 09:20 PM
crab pots bigfish6 Mid Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay 1 05-27-2008 11:47 AM
Crab Pots fred2d Northeast 9 04-22-2006 08:41 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0