The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Marine Electronics Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Salmon, the other pink meat.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2009, 01:20 PM
  #1    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 347
Default Cell signal amplifier

Is there a type out there that actually works?

I'd like to get one on my boat, however, seems like everything I read out there is just not that good or reviews say it does not meet expectations.

Has anyone found one that works?
__________________


my album
http://www.thehulltruth.com/members/...ysea-lady.html

Lady's Travels:
From Minnesota on Lake Superior to Nassau, to Charleston, SC., to Key West, Fl. & Return.
Charleston to Windsor, Ontario Canada
Now exploring the Great Lakes...
RaySea Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 07:00 AM
  #2    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 347
Default

I guess no answer is my answer, no one has found one that works...
__________________


my album
http://www.thehulltruth.com/members/...ysea-lady.html

Lady's Travels:
From Minnesota on Lake Superior to Nassau, to Charleston, SC., to Key West, Fl. & Return.
Charleston to Windsor, Ontario Canada
Now exploring the Great Lakes...
RaySea Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-09-2009, 08:03 AM
  #3    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Champlain, VT / St Augustine, FL
Posts: 266
Default

I have a Digital Antenna wireless cell amp/repeater.

It does not amplify or repeat anything that I can see.

The unit has been back to Digital, they say it's working fine. I have given up on it.

Bill
Mainship 390
__________________
Mainship 390 Trawler
millennium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 08:33 AM
  #4    
Edd
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Inland Waters of California
Posts: 987
Default

We have a Wilson on the houseboat and it works just fine at the lake. I don't know how they work, I just know that without it I can't use my cell. I also made the mistake of getting the wireless type. On any weekend the dock-space in front of my houseboat is a large gathering area The guys in the slip next to me thanked me. Now they don't need to spend $300+.

Edd
__________________
If you didn't get a Border Collie, you shoulda just got a CAT!
Edd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 08:37 AM
  #5    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CMCH NJ
Posts: 1,525
Default

I have 1 in my house-antenna on roof

Improves my signal by 1 bar-gtes me reception in most of house
Spooled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 08:56 AM
  #6    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Halifax MA
Posts: 2,230
Default

ther was/is a company called M-tech that makes a very robust cell repeater but I cant find any info about them. I installed one on a Lobster boat and the owner reports great reception offshore but like I said a google search came up with Zero.
good luck.
__________________
"I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends"
CMEBoston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 09:54 AM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 269
Default

The best way to get offshore cell reception is a high efficiency antenna, as high on the boat as you can get it, then good quality coaxial couplings to the phone. I must admit when we did this it was an old "bag" phone that had an antenna jack so I'm not sure how you would couple it in now-days at the phone end. I imagine, a second high efficiency antenna on the receiver end below decks in the vicinity of the cell phone(s) would re-transmit the data. This passive signal transfer is used on steel vessels. But without any amplifier, just getting the antenna about 25 feet above the water gave us 50 miles off shore.

There is a downside. When we would get back to the dock the antenna had to be disabled. With the high efficiency it would pick up multiple cells even on lowest (automatic) power and the cell companies get very upset if you start doing that.
yandina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 10:10 AM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 4,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaySea Lady View Post
Is there a type out there that actually works?

I'd like to get one on my boat, however, seems like everything I read out there is just not that good or reviews say it does not meet expectations.

Has anyone found one that works?
What is your expectation? Is it additional range or more power? If it is power get an amplifier. If it is range then you need a taller antenna.
jethro1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 10:32 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,035
Default

I've installed some that work. Only problem is that the ones that actually work are intended for office / home. Consist of a Yagi antenna, a booster, and a transciever that mounts on the ceiling and some RG-8 cable. I installed one in a construction site in a jobsite trailer about 4 years ago. Went back several weeks later and there must have been 15 guys inside that trailer talking on cell phones! Kind of funny. Everyone at the site would migrate inside the trailer to have cell phone converations and although the phones worked fine inside the trailer, with so many conversations going on, it was still hard to have a conversation.

I know. Doesn't answer the OP's question but usefull info regardless.
Back-in-Black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 11:16 AM
  #10    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jethro1 View Post
What is your expectation? Is it additional range or more power? If it is power get an amplifier. If it is range then you need a taller antenna.


Not sure I understand the question. Don't both of them provide the same end result? More range? Why would I need more power if it does not provide more range?

I am looking for more range, 40 to 50 miles would work for me, on my blackberry, in the Great lakes I am losing signal at about 5 miles off shore even though my flybridge is 14 feet up.

The only connection on the blackberry is power and USB. Don't think I can connect an antennae unless it has a USB connection.
__________________


my album
http://www.thehulltruth.com/members/...ysea-lady.html

Lady's Travels:
From Minnesota on Lake Superior to Nassau, to Charleston, SC., to Key West, Fl. & Return.
Charleston to Windsor, Ontario Canada
Now exploring the Great Lakes...
RaySea Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 12:07 PM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: mass/Point Judith, RI dockage
Posts: 6,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaySea Lady View Post
Not sure I understand the question. Don't both of them provide the same end result? More range? Why would I need more power if it does not provide more range?

I am looking for more range, 40 to 50 miles would work for me, on my blackberry, in the Great lakes I am losing signal at about 5 miles off shore even though my flybridge is 14 feet up.

The only connection on the blackberry is power and USB. Don't think I can connect an antennae unless it has a USB connection.
there are both wireless and wired cell amps. The digital model is wired - at least the one I have is. But I've seen wireless repeaters as well. Your phone will use the repeater as a tower (it's not, just the same result), and it will comm with other towers.
__________________


Terry Jason 35, Yanmar 370 hp, Lots of fun at a leisurely pace
gerg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 12:30 PM
  #12    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerg View Post
there are both wireless and wired cell amps. The digital model is wired - at least the one I have is. But I've seen wireless repeaters as well. Your phone will use the repeater as a tower (it's not, just the same result), and it will comm with other towers.
Thanks for the clarification.

So, a repeater is what I should be looking for?

Any idea which one works best?
__________________


my album
http://www.thehulltruth.com/members/...ysea-lady.html

Lady's Travels:
From Minnesota on Lake Superior to Nassau, to Charleston, SC., to Key West, Fl. & Return.
Charleston to Windsor, Ontario Canada
Now exploring the Great Lakes...
RaySea Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 06:59 AM
  #13    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location:
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMEBoston View Post
ther was/is a company called M-tech that makes a very robust cell repeater but I cant find any info about them. I installed one on a Lobster boat and the owner reports great reception offshore but like I said a google search came up with Zero.
good luck.

http://www.marineelectronicsjournal....company_id=471



that is the company info. their website appears to be down. i havent installed one of their systems in about 6 months, i wonder if they are out of business. they did make a good product though.
__________________
i'm just some idiot from the internet
Idiot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 08:00 AM
  #14    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 4,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaySea Lady View Post
Not sure I understand the question. Don't both of them provide the same end result? More range? Why would I need more power if it does not provide more range?

I am looking for more range, 40 to 50 miles would work for me, on my blackberry, in the Great lakes I am losing signal at about 5 miles off shore even though my flybridge is 14 feet up.

The only connection on the blackberry is power and USB. Don't think I can connect an antennae unless it has a USB connection.
Transmissions from VHF and UHF radios are line of sight. More power does not necessarily equate to more range. A taller antenna is generally the answer, not more power.

Think of this. A typical airplane VHF radio does not have a lot of power. Maybe not much more than 10 watts, if that. At 10,000 feet altitude, the receive and transmit distance can be 100 miles or more. With the airplane on the ground the transmit and receive distances can be less than several miles.
jethro1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 11:32 AM
  #15    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Halifax MA
Posts: 2,230
Default

Thanks Idiot, been looking for them and didint even think to look there.
__________________
"I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends"
CMEBoston is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cell phone amplifier, anyone using them? acendhole The Boating Forum 19 09-14-2010 07:00 PM
Best working CELL PHONE amplifier Bogii The Boating Forum 5 09-19-2007 10:42 PM
Digital DA4000 Cell Amplifier flybynite Marine Electronics Forum 2 11-06-2006 11:10 PM
New Cell Phone Amplifier Bullshipper Marine Electronics Forum 15 05-08-2005 08:50 AM
Cell Phone Amplifier casboating Marine Electronics Forum 6 04-24-2005 06:59 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0