The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Marine Electronics Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Never try to teach a pig to sing, it wastes your time, and annoys the pig.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2009, 04:09 PM
  #1    
tcm
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
Default S

1

Last edited by tcm; 12-02-2010 at 05:44 PM.
tcm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:13 PM
  #2    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 406
Default

How deep do they suspect it will go in saltwater?
The Hat Island Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-07-2009, 05:14 PM
  #3    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brooklyn, N.Y
Posts: 291
Default

Here, more structure scan
http://http://www.lowrance.com/en/StructureScan/
khalito is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:30 PM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 6,000
Default

tcm

Do you have any idea what exactly we are seeing in the top (large) first pic in that first set? Thanks.
KeyPineSavage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:31 PM
  #5    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 6,000
Default

khalito

Note the extra "http://" at the start of your link.
KeyPineSavage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 05:56 AM
  #6    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: FL USA
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeyPineSavage View Post
khalito

Note the extra "http://" at the start of your link.
Here you go

http://www.lowrance.com/en/StructureScan/

Looks very cool
__________________
MrPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 06:22 AM
  #7    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Westville, KZN, South Africa
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hat Island Pirate View Post
How deep do they suspect it will go in saltwater?
I took it to just shy of 150ft on 800kHz and it was awesome. So I would imagine that the 455kHz will penetrate a lot further.



__________________
Fishton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 08:04 AM
  #8    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cape Coral, Fl
Posts: 263
Default

Cool pics no doubt. Does anyone know if the signal this puts out would interfere with a standard transducer 50/200k? Could you run them at the same time?
__________________
If it don't matter to you, it don't matter to me...
shipahoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 08:12 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brookhaven, LI, NY
Posts: 14,577
Send a message via MSN to Birdman
Default

Questions:

1. What the hell is that in the first picture? Looks like an undwater bridge? OR, is that in a fishtank?

2. Is this using a regular type transducer, OR, is it using an underwater type dragged sidescan type ducer?

3. Why are there shadow's in the images? If you look at fishton's posted images, there are shadows on the sides of the "mountains". Is that caused from the regular transducer because it is simply pointing down like a regular ducer?

4. Will these freqs see fish as well, or just structure?
__________________
Birdman, Capt of

30 Rampage Express, 315 Yanmars
http://www.thehulltruth.com/members/...s-machria.html
Birdman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 09:12 AM
  #10    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 1,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman View Post
Questions:

1. What the hell is that in the first picture? Looks like an undwater bridge? OR, is that in a fishtank?

2. Is this using a regular type transducer, OR, is it using an underwater type dragged sidescan type ducer?

3. Why are there shadow's in the images? If you look at fishton's posted images, there are shadows on the sides of the "mountains". Is that caused from the regular transducer because it is simply pointing down like a regular ducer?

4. Will these freqs see fish as well, or just structure?
My guess is that what look like shawdows are areas that the down scan doesnt get a good return from as the are vertical.. These areas would be displayed in a darker color. The surfaces that the down scan pics up which flatter at the top are displayed in a lighter color. Thus a shawdow effect.

All these down scan shots have me wanting to add one to my boat to work in conjunction with my FCV585. The questioned that was asked previously which I also want to know is if down scan can be used while a 50/200Khz sounder is on without compromising either. I am really amazed at the quality of the images produced by this technology. I wonder if and when Garmin or Furuno might produce something similar??

When is down scan going to be released?
__________________
Glacier Bay 2680 Coastal

slief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:29 PM
  #11    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 406
Default

It looks like a B/W photograph created back in the 1800's.
I wonder what's instore for us when we finally get to the end of the marine electronics rainbow?

Last edited by The Hat Island Pirate; 10-08-2009 at 12:46 PM.
The Hat Island Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:49 PM
  #12    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pompano Beach, FL
Posts: 4,888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hat Island Pirate View Post
I wonder what's instore for us when we finally get to the end of the marine electronics rainbow?
A lot more having to reboot your chartplotter.

Seriously, Humminbird was doing this 4 years ago. I had their first side scan unit and it was very cool... when the water was flat, pretty impressive detail. However, try to use it in 2-4 and it was impossible. Curious what these guys have done differently and if anyone has solved the problem of wave interferance through software. (a la "digital image stabilization" on cameras)
__________________

2008 Pro-Line 23 Sport For Sale
Flot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 02:26 PM
  #13    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Indian River, De
Posts: 1,860
Default

It seems to me that wave action, being cyclicle, or repetitious to some predictable degree, could be cancelled in a software algorythm, as I'm sure, the varying shades of brown, and shadow-effects are being done.

I'll also take a shot at answering the question as to whether structure-scan can be used simultaneously with a standard 50/200 ducer. I do think that the frequencies are far enough apart, that there would be no noticeable interference. You can, after all, you can already use 50 and 200 with a standard sounder, at them same time. So until someone comes out with a statement to the contrary, I say it will work just fine.
__________________
Capt Will, 2002 G/W 282 Sailfish, F225's
USCG Master, 50 Ton; Towing endorsement
Indian River, De
CaptWill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 02:50 PM
  #14    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ft Myers, FL
Posts: 167
Default

If there is the right accelerometer then they may be able to wash out the 3 to 4 footers.

The dark areas that look like shadows are indeed shadows, when I demoed the unit thats what the tech said and they matched up with the object causing the shadow pretty good.

Where was all this conversation a month ago before I bought my 3210 package?
__________________
No matter how bad things are, the government can always make them worse!
fooltain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 07:01 PM
  #15    
Admirals Club Captains Club Member
THT sponsor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 418
Default

The structure scan transducer has 455 kHz, 800 kHz and 200 kHz freq's available. There will be no interferrence between them. From what I have read, there is a mode where you can process the 200 kHz sonar and overlay the imaging sonar onto your normal sonar display. This helps in the visulization of the sonar picture under your boat. Also, 50 kHz will also be far enough away from the other freq's as to not be a problem.
__________________
Capt. Ken Lahr
Reel Draggin' Tackle
Reel Draggin' Tackle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 07:23 PM
  #16    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 186
Default

While it's nice to see other manufacturers using this technology, it's been on the humminbird's for several years. I use one in the Gulf every trip and it has been the best diving purchase ever. Worthless in anything deeper than 100ft, but that covers pretty much 90% of us on the west coast of FL.
__________________
_______________________________
..CONTENDER 25 Open w/200 HPDI's..
The Catahoula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 12:02 AM
  #17    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Westville, KZN, South Africa
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman View Post
Questions:
1. What the hell is that in the first picture? Looks like an undwater bridge? OR, is that in a fishtank*?

It is a very steep drop off / under water cliff.



* that's just being silly


2. Is this using a regular type transducer, OR, is it using an underwater type dragged sidescan type ducer?

It is the LSS-1 455/800kHz transducer



3. Why are there shadow's in the images? If you look at fishton's posted images, there are shadows on the sides of the "mountains". Is that caused from the regular transducer because it is simply pointing down like a regular ducer?

See cones in image above .........

4. Will these freqs see fish as well, or just structure?

Both ............

__________________
Fishton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:09 AM
  #18    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Fl
Posts: 1,734
Default

Very cool picture of the school bus underwater. I want to see how that LSS-1 transducer mounts. Looks kind of funky to me.
__________________
What kind of cosmic bunny hole is THT? Breast implants seem to be a moral issue.... They're BOOBS!!!
Mersiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 09:25 AM
  #19    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 1,089
Default

Does anybody know what options might be available for us Cat owners regarding mounting the transducer? The structure scan ducer is around 7" long plus the kick up bracket for transom mounting. I am considering structure scan to compliment my Furuno 585 1Kw thur hull set up. I was thinking about getting one on back order but I dont know if mounting it will be possible for my setup. Worst case, I might be able to make a retractable bracket that mounts on my swim ladder mount but that is certainly not ideal.

__________________
Glacier Bay 2680 Coastal

slief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 05:59 AM
  #20    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15
Default

Does anyone have a picture of the structure scan ducer that they coud post up, as i have the same problem as Slief.
Thanks
Thirtyort06 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lowrance Structure Scan FASTFJR Marine Electronics Forum 18 12-03-2010 09:15 AM
Amazing Structure Scan tcm Marine Electronics Forum 10 09-27-2009 09:35 AM
structure scan nodoubt Marine Electronics Q&A with BOE Marine 2 08-20-2009 06:43 PM
Twin Scan/Flo Scan for sale DeepDropper Fishing & Miscellaneous Items 1 11-20-2007 11:52 PM
locating structure blackfin29 SportFishing and Charters Forum 4 10-14-2006 10:33 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0