The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > Marine Electronics Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2007, 11:54 PM
  #1    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 15
Default furuno vs raymarine

I was wondering which bottom machine you think would be better a raymarine dsx600 or furuno fcv620.. also was wondering which transducer would be best a thru hull or transom mount? this machine would be used on a 23' center console. any help would be apreciated
jkaufmann558 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:12 AM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 352
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

I'm no expert on marine electronics and I can't speak specifically to either of the units you've referenced here, but for what its worth, I'd go with the Raymarine every time if it were me. I've owned both and I recently bought a used boat with a Furuno unit pre-installed. It simply doesn't compare in terms of user friendiness, features, versatility, size, clarity, overall visibility, etc. And I'd be surprised if the preponderance of other users disagree with that.
Reef Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 01-08-2007, 12:14 AM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pensacola, Fl.
Posts: 6,603
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

HaHa Furuno 620. Knobs are King. Menu button's SUCK!
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Just 'cause it's new, doesn't mean it's worth a Damn."

warthog5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:18 AM
  #4    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ON THE WATER
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

the bigger the transducers in watts is better
both are great machines what it comes down to is watts
__________________
VOLVO OCEAN RACE team JUST-IN-TIME

switchbait.com
JUSTINTIME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:21 AM
  #5    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 352
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

On girls they sure are, but then, those typically need alot of manipulating too! I'll stick with the Ray-
Reef Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:25 AM
  #6    
edk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 904
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Quote:
Reef Ranger - 1/7/2007 11:12 PM

I'm no expert on marine electronics and I can't speak specifically to either of the units you've referenced here, but for what its worth, I'd go with the Raymarine every time if it were me. I've owned both and I recently bought a used boat with a Furuno unit pre-installed. It simply doesn't compare in terms of user friendiness, features, versatility, size, clarity, overall visibility, etc. And I'd be surprised if the preponderance of other users disagree with that.
Let me be the first to surprise you . I would pick Furuno over Raymarine any day of the week based on performance, reliability, customer service and user friendliness. I don't have any direct experience with the models mentioned but currently have Navnet 1 and love it.

Asking the question on the "Marine Electronics" forum might get the original poster more information.

Ed
edk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:31 AM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pensacola, Fl.
Posts: 6,603
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Yep X-ducer has a lot to do with it. Let's put it on a level playing field and use a B-60 tilted element X-ducer. It's 600watt's.

Raymarine 600X = 500 Watts output power

Furuno 620 = 600 watts.

Read the problem's that folk's have had with their Ray's in the Electronic's section. Then read about the Furuno.

This stuff is all made to run in Auto mode. Auto mode kick's filters in. this filters imfo out too. It's made that way for Dummies.
Learn to run your stuff in manual mode. Ask the tech's at the manufactures and they will tell you that.

Knobs are KING for running in manual mode. I teach people in 2min how to operate my Furuno 582 that have never seen one before.

Adjust the depth = turn the knob
Adjust the gain = turn another knob.


Did I mention that raymarine doesn't get another dime of my money? Screw me once shame on you. Screw me twice shame on me.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Just 'cause it's new, doesn't mean it's worth a Damn."

warthog5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:33 AM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 352
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Good point Ed, I was just going to suggest the same thing. As for Furuno and NavNet, I've currently got the 1710C with C-MAP and I would agree with respect to Customer Service (its XLNT with Furuno), but functionally, I much prefer the C60 Raymarine.
Reef Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:34 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 352
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Good point Ed, I was just going to suggest the same thing. As for Furuno and NavNet, I've currently got the 1710C with C-MAP and I would agree with respect to Customer Service (its XLNT with Furuno), but functionally, I much prefer the C60 Raymarine.
Reef Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:53 AM
  #10    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Whitesboro, texas
Posts: 7,214
Send a message via AIM to welder
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Furuno

I love my GP7000F

__________________
F350 4x4/ Dodge 2500HD 5.9L Cummins
Leaving the Picture of the Ford cuz I miss it
Pacific 2325 cc
Honda bf225
aluminumalloyboats.com
welder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 01:53 AM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 352
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Wow! What a shocker! That's 4 outta 5 votes in favor of Raymarine. Go figure! Maybe that's why 9 outta 10 boats for-sale have Raymarines on them. Bah-haaa!

I guess I'll take a harder look at my Furuno GP-1710C to see what I'm missin'!
Reef Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 08:05 AM
  #12    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 459
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

I can speak to Raymarine customer service. I have a Raymarine Auto Pilot system, the control head needed a code upgrade. I fed-ex'd it up there monday, they did the work and fed-ex'd it back to me so that I would be able to use it for the weekend. I'm a raymarine fan.
__________________
2003 Wellcraft 290 Coastal twin F225 - SOLD!!!
1998 Hydra-Sports 2000CC F225 - FOR SALE!!
2005 Hydra-Sports 2500CC Twin F150
Dal929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 08:36 AM
  #13    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,736
Send a message via MSN to fishcop
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Quote:
warthog5 - 1/8/2007 12:31 AM

Yep X-ducer has a lot to do with it. Let's put it on a level playing field and use a B-60 tilted element X-ducer. It's 600watt's.

Raymarine 600X = 500 Watts output power

Furuno 620 = 600 watts.

Read the problem's that folk's have had with their Ray's in the Electronic's section. Then read about the Furuno.

This stuff is all made to run in Auto mode. Auto mode kick's filters in. this filters imfo out too. It's made that way for Dummies.
Learn to run your stuff in manual mode. Ask the tech's at the manufactures and they will tell you that.

Knobs are KING for running in manual mode. I teach people in 2min how to operate my Furuno 582 that have never seen one before.

Adjust the depth = turn the knob
Adjust the gain = turn another knob.


Did I mention that raymarine doesn't get another dime of my money? Screw me once shame on you. Screw me twice shame on me.

First I agree with you totally as far as running in manual instead of auto. However I don't understand whats your obsession with knobs. It actually sounds ridiculous that you would pic a unit beacuse it has knobs. I mean if your missing fingers or maybe your captian hook?

I fish boats with both units on a regular basis. As far as normal applications go I think the average fish finder like the two mentioned here are basicallly on a level playing field and really comes down to personal preference. On the more adavanced commercial models then I would go Furuno all the way. However, If your planning on a multi use unit like the e- series, c-series, or nav net, then there are other things to consider. The Raymarine is my choice then.
fishcop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 08:45 AM
  #14    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Jacksonville, FL.
Posts: 6,685
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

If you want problems, choose the Ray. If you actually want to use your bottom machine, choose Furuno. Problem after problem with the Ray stuff in the electronics forum. Don't take my word for it, go look for yourself.
__________________
JAGSARE1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 09:38 AM
  #15    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,036
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Some good advice here (fishcop) and some uninformed biased advice.

Best thing to do (and what I did) was to contact Jim at BOE and talk to him. He is great, knows his stuff, and can help you. Plus he has great prices.

Kg
keith91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 09:39 AM
  #16    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kent Island, MD, USA
Posts: 587
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

According to the Pro, Yacht Jim (BOE):
Wow, I would have to write a book to cover the pros and cons of all four systems you have descibed. Price for any of them is going to be pretty close equally equipped. Here is what most consider to be the scoop - Furuno is best for radar, Raymarine best for FF, and Garmin best for gps. Taking into account all three operations Raymarine and Simrad shine as being pretty good across the board. The worst chartplotter is Furuno and the worst FF and Radar is Garmin. (mind you, I would be perfectly content on a boat with any of these setups so the differences are minor as far as I am concerned). For construction Furuno is #1, ray and simrad # 2 and garmin # 4. Ease of use across the board would put Garmin at #1, Ray #2 and Fur/Simrad at #4.


I have RM C80 with all the extras for almost 2 years and I am satisfied. I would purchase the same RM stuff again if I were in the market today.
__________________
Everglades 243
topfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 09:54 AM
  #17    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Augustine, Fl
Posts: 9,615
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

I have used Garmin and Furuno F/F's. Furuno is better and the customer service I have received from Furuno has been top notch...With all the complaints I have seen on the electronics page, I would be hesitant to spend my hard earned money on one.
__________________
"I'm suing the THT and the guy that made it."



Cracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:11 AM
  #18    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wanchese, NC
Posts: 8,019
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

If you want the real truth go walk around your comercial and charter fleet dock. There is a reason why most use Furuno, these guys need there equipment to function day in and day out. The best como units and the best finders.......Mark

These guys do not have a biased opinion they need equipment that works 24-7,,,,,
__________________


"HATTERAS VIDEO PLEASE WATCH "

" SOMEWHERE OFF THE COAST OF NORTH CAROLINA "


offshore3144 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:22 AM
  #19    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pensacola, Fl.
Posts: 6,603
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Quote:
However I don't understand whats your obsession with knobs. It actually sounds ridiculous that you would pic a unit beacuse it has knobs.
That is only one reason, but pushing multi buttons for a menu just plain Suck's anymore.

As I said I can teach someone that has never seen it to operate a Furuno with knobs in 2min.
That will NEVER happen with a unit that you have to jump thru menu's.

This speak's volume's as to the user friendliness of how easy they are to operate in a manual mode.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Just 'cause it's new, doesn't mean it's worth a Damn."

warthog5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:33 AM
  #20    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,053
Default Re: furuno vs raymarine

Raymarine does it for me...DEFINETLY for the DF. I have used a newer Furuno and the Raymarine. Hands down Raymarine! Totally easier to use and won't need adjustments. Mine never needs adjusting. Out of the box works fantastic. I have the 600dx and the DSM 250 system. On different freq's. People are always amazed at how well they work!! And again, without messing with 'em!!

http://groups.msn.com/HewescraftBoat...to&PhotoID=807

see the nightime look above...
Hewesfissher is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
raymarine or furuno total mayhem Marine Electronics Q&A with BOE Marine 1 02-18-2006 06:35 PM
Raymarine vs Furuno Red_Tag Marine Electronics Forum 12 11-15-2005 02:17 PM
furuno or raymarine CAPE HORN 27 Marine Electronics Forum 19 09-29-2003 08:22 AM
Furuno vs. Raymarine Buck Wild Marine Electronics Forum 6 08-21-2003 09:19 AM
Furuno vs Raymarine busterone Marine Electronics Forum 6 03-03-2003 05:08 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0