The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Marriage is a serious commitment...you might be talking about a good 4 or 5 years of your life.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2009, 01:43 PM
  #61    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 260
Default

Hey dan...its old...don't turn this into a brand war...take your etec bashing elsewhere...no one is talking about them here...lets stay on topic!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by JHC-CPA View Post
The E-tec’s supposed advantage was they were significantly lighter and had more torque than four stroke outboards. Now with Yamaha’s next generation of lighter V6 225 and 250 hp four strokes ( both weighing just 558 lbs ) the weight difference is only 34 lbs between them and the E-tec ( 524 lbs ). The difference is even less for Yamaha’s new V6 300 hp vs the 300 hp E-tec ( 528 lbs ) at just 30 lbs – insignificant even for flats boats and older two stroke powered boats. And with Yamaha’s new V6 engines now having much larger displacements at 254 cu. inches, they’ll have greater torque too so that eliminates that argument as well.


Even Yamaha’s current four strokes already get much better fuel economy than the gas hog E-tec 250’s, I know I owned a pair, and seeing how Yamaha made better fuel economy a priority with their next gen that is sure to increase significantly as well. Combine this large savings in fuel with no more of Evinrude’s horribly expensive xd100 two stroke oil ( and most likely higher prices for gas and oil coming next year ) and it will cost MUCH more to run an E-tec. With the E-tec’s weight and torque advantages totally gone they just don’t offer any advantages anymore.



Mercury’s Verado has proven itself as having a BMW level of refinement and quality in the outboard world, Yamaha has always had a reputation for reliability, and Suzuki has established itself as the best value in an outboard engine. Collectively Mercury, Yamaha, and Suzuki have out engineered, out marketed, and overall just outsmarted Evinrude. Compared to the huge improvements in both Mercury and now Yamaha’s next generation four strokes the E-tec looks like an 8 bit Apple II computer vs a state of the art Dell with Windows 7.



With several boat manufacturers recently having gone out of business I’m looking for one of the outboard manufactures to follow and the company with the weakest product line is now Evinrude. I had a long discussion with the sales manager of a large outboard engine Superstore in Virginia and he told me their E-tec sales are “a joke” compared to four strokes. And just this month the VP and General Manager of Evinrude, Roch Lambert, quit and left the company - he may very well know the end is near for them.



There are sure to be many boat tests coming in the near future on Yamaha’s next Generation V6’s and the proof will be there for all to see.
JasonPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 02:35 PM
  #62    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,983
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonPaul View Post
Hey dan...its old...don't turn this into a brand war...take your etec bashing elsewhere...no one is talking about them here...lets stay on topic!!
Yup, it's old.....I wish Yamaha success with their new engines,...it will be interesting to see how they compare with the verado and the smaller zukes.....Verado took the straight 6, supercharger route.....cool, but heavy.....I don't think I'd sign up for the first ones though....again, I don't think this is the death nail to any engine manufacturer out there....they each have their own advantages....the death nail will be if cap and trade passes the senate....then boating will take a back seat to everything, and the largest marine marketplace in the world will dry up......it won't matter what you run..!!!!!!!!!

FloridaRob
30 Grady Marlin
250 ETECS
floridarob is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 11-18-2009, 03:32 PM
  #63    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location:
Posts: 178
Default

JHC-CPA: You need to develop a positive attitude, instead of bashing. I think it's great that Yamaha has improved their engines - it's good for boaters and the industry. I doubt the other brands will roll-over and die, instead they will improve their product. And I doubt anyone with a good, existing motor will now dump it over the side.
plumsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 03:57 PM
  #64    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,671
Default

Let the bashing and hate begain!!!
__________________
Jim
49erJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 05:48 PM
  #65    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,498
Default

what will the GPH be at WOT?...i cant find it
Rod27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 06:09 PM
  #66    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,498
Default

i found the performance bulletins if anyone wants to see......looks like around 28gph at WOT for the 2 boats they have listed with F300 power. A Skeeter ZX24 V and a Key West 2300 SS .

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/outboard...px?ls=outboard
Rod27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 06:31 PM
  #67    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod27 View Post
i found the performance bulletins if anyone wants to see......looks like around 28gph at WOT for the 2 boats they have listed with F300 power. A Skeeter ZX24 V and a Key West 2300 SS .

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/outboard...px?ls=outboard
Thats the V8 300, the weight is 804 on the test sheet and it has a date of 2008.
T-bone123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:21 AM
  #68    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,498
Default

so then my question remains.....have the performance numbers been released?.....what is gph at WOT?
Rod27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:51 AM
  #69    
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 74
Default

I just spoke to my local Yama Dealer - the price quoted was 20K and delivery would be best case April probably May - this is for the 300. The engines look really sweet and if they prove to be reliable may be the the last nail in the BRP Evinrude E-Tec 200-300 engines. I suspect you will be seeing some pricing actions from BRP as these babies roll-out.
mcrinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:52 AM
  #70    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Posts: 2,700
Default

One thing y'all have to remember is that the new Yamahas are prototype motors so any performance and economy readings are subject to change. This happens to all brands of motors when pre-production models are released to the media and discussed on the internet.

The true figures will be when an engine is produced on a production line and then tested for speed, performance, and fuel economy after being EPA certified.
__________________
----------------

*... personally possessing more tools than talent !
__________________________________________________ _
seahorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 08:57 AM
  #71    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location:
Posts: 178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrinc View Post
I just spoke to my local Yama Dealer - the price quoted was 20K and delivery would be best case April probably May - this is for the 300. The engines look really sweet and if they prove to be reliable may be the the last nail in the BRP Evinrude E-Tec 200-300 engines. I suspect you will be seeing some pricing actions from BRP as these babies roll-out.

Huh, last nail? So I guess Honda and Merc will need to lower their prices too since their engines (especially Honda) are heavier and now totally obsolete? Suzuki should now exit the marine market because they no longer have the biggest discplacement in their class.

If anything, it's the end of the Yamaha HPDI and F300.
plumsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 02:47 PM
  #72    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shopping
Posts: 423
Default

SIM, come on if you rode a 31 edgewater the number one question all of us will have (your customers included) is what is the fuel burn rate at 4000, 4500, and WOT(or 6000). Give us the numbers this will tell us most of what we need to know relative to the Zuki 300 and VRod 300.

Can't see why anyone, except those with the overweight for their boat 350's, would repower until they see the numbers....

I like it though!!!
Doghouse2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 03:41 PM
  #73    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doghouse2 View Post
SIM, come on if you rode a 31 edgewater the number one question all of us will have (your customers included) is what is the fuel burn rate at 4000, 4500, and WOT(or 6000). Give us the numbers this will tell us most of what we need to know relative to the Zuki 300 and VRod 300.

Can't see why anyone, except those with the overweight for their boat 350's, would repower until they see the numbers....

I like it though!!!

These numbers are printed in their "Hot Sheet" with all 3 engines rigged (individually) on a 257 Grady White crusiing at 3500RPMs

-Yamaha F300 // 3.34mpg
-Mercury V300 // 2.84mpg
-Suzuki DF300 // 2.32mpg
ohilovewater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 04:04 PM
  #74    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohilovewater View Post
These numbers are printed in their "Hot Sheet" with all 3 engines rigged (individually) on a 257 Grady White crusiing at 3500RPMs

-Yamaha F300 // 3.34mpg
-Mercury V300 // 2.84mpg
-Suzuki DF300 // 2.32mpg
Boy if those #'s are true, the Zuki sucks (fuel that is, ha ha)
__________________
22' Activator, 250xs Merc Opti
18' Wellcraft CC, 150 Merc Opti

blkmtrfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 04:34 PM
  #75    
SIM
Senior MemberVendorCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington Island,Wi USA
Posts: 11,407
Send a message via AIM to SIM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doghouse2 View Post
SIM, come on if you rode a 31 edgewater the number one question all of us will have (your customers included) is what is the fuel burn rate at 4000, 4500, and WOT(or 6000). Give us the numbers this will tell us most of what we need to know relative to the Zuki 300 and VRod 300.

Can't see why anyone, except those with the overweight for their boat 350's, would repower until they see the numbers....

I like it though!!!
I can't recall exactly what I saw (windy and cold and I didn't feel like writing stuff down and the NO pictures rule), but I can quote it out of the perf bulletins they gave us on those boats.

27 Contender Tournament with new 4.2 twin F300's 21P SW2 props 7618 lbs

WOT 5900 62.8mph 51.5gph 1.22 mpg
5000 53.8 35.5 1.52
4500 47.8 28.5 1.68
4000 42.3 21.8 1.94
3500 36.8 16.2 2.27
3000 29.9 12.8 2.34 Best mpg

Edgewater 318CC 10,075 lbs new 4.2 twin F300's 19p SW2 Props

WOT 6050 57.1 mph 53.5gph 1.08 mpg
5500 52.1 42.3 1.23
5000 46.7 35.1 1.33
4500 41.8 29.4 1.42
4000 36.9 22.7 1.63
3500 31.4 17.1 1.84 Best mpg
__________________
Andy Munao
Our new parts site: www.simyamaha.com
Yamaha Outboard Sales, Parts and Service
1-800-213-3323 parts@shipyardisland.com
Click the logo to see our THT Vendor Forum
SIM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:04 PM
  #76    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shopping
Posts: 423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohilovewater View Post
These numbers are printed in their "Hot Sheet" with all 3 engines rigged (individually) on a 257 Grady White crusiing at 3500RPMs

-Yamaha F300 // 3.34mpg
-Mercury V300 // 2.84mpg
-Suzuki DF300 // 2.32mpg

Thanks but those don't mean anything if you don't know how they are propeed as the speed difference can make up for the fuel burn.
Doghouse2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:06 PM
  #77    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shopping
Posts: 423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIM View Post
I can't recall exactly what I saw (windy and cold and I didn't feel like writing stuff down and the NO pictures rule), but I can quote it out of the perf bulletins they gave us on those boats.

27 Contender Tournament with new 4.2 twin F300's 21P SW2 props 7618 lbs

WOT 5900 62.8mph 51.5gph 1.22 mpg
5000 53.8 35.5 1.52
4500 47.8 28.5 1.68
4000 42.3 21.8 1.94
3500 36.8 16.2 2.27
3000 29.9 12.8 2.34 Best mpg

Edgewater 318CC 10,075 lbs new 4.2 twin F300's 19p SW2 Props

WOT 6050 57.1 mph 53.5gph 1.08 mpg
5500 52.1 42.3 1.23
5000 46.7 35.1 1.33
4500 41.8 29.4 1.42
4000 36.9 22.7 1.63
3500 31.4 17.1 1.84 Best mpg

SIM Thanks, those numbers work as they are very similar to the Zuki numbers, perhaps a bit better, and better than the Vrod 300 #s. Was hoping the 4k and 4.5k gph numbers woulld be more like 20 and 25/26 respectively, but still strong results for the power.
Doghouse2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 05:38 PM
  #78    
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plumsal View Post
Huh, last nail? So I guess Honda and Merc will need to lower their prices too since their engines (especially Honda) are heavier and now totally obsolete? Suzuki should now exit the marine market because they no longer have the biggest discplacement in their class.

If anything, it's the end of the Yamaha HPDI and F300.
You are correct the HPDI and 300 & 350 are dead meat. Pricing will be a direct response to the Yama pricing, initial performance & market acceptance. These new engines will also provide a quick and economical solution for current Yama installs 4 stroke 200- 350 & HPDI - which will stop competitive erosion, increase production and reduce cost for competitive replacement - all current 4 stroke manufacturers will have to respond with new product or new pricing to compete. I do not understand your displacment remark - not sure anyone buys an engine because of the displacement. In general I agree with your comments - good job.
mcrinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 09:41 PM
  #79    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIM View Post
I
Edgewater 318CC 10,075 lbs new 4.2 twin F300's 19p SW2 Props

WOT 6050 57.1 mph 53.5gph 1.08 mpg
5500 52.1 42.3 1.23
5000 46.7 35.1 1.33
4500 41.8 29.4 1.42
4000 36.9 22.7 1.63
3500 31.4 17.1 1.84 Best mpg
no offense but those Edgewater numbers are poor or dont make sense. A 31ft boat with twin 300's should be more economical than that. Maybe with a full fuel load????
Rod27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 10:08 PM
  #80    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ & FL
Posts: 12,408
Default

I am anxious to see the numbers of a pair of 250s on a 306 Bimin... We saw 1.1-1.2mpg with the OX-66s and with the old F250s 1.3-1.4
__________________
Mike
http://www.thehulltruth.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=17887&dateline=132844  6335

Livin the dream...
Afishinado is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 Blade propellor for Yamaha 350 V8 outboard Rockyw The Boating Forum 3 03-12-2009 08:09 AM
1995 Yamaha 115 2-stk Outboard chrisrack Fishing & Miscellaneous Items 7 04-09-2007 01:43 PM
Suzuki 250/four stroke or Evinrude E-Tec 250/two stroke?? homey The Boating Forum 57 09-25-2005 08:34 AM
Merc motors to be built in China? Brewhedd The Boating Forum 20 02-14-2005 02:15 PM
Yamaha Outboard Diagnostic Equipment GatorBoater The Boating Forum 8 06-21-2004 10:44 AM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0