The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum

Notices

Random Quote: To err is Human said the rooster as he climbed off the duck.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2004, 05:35 PM
  #1    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
Posts: 424
Default Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

On two stoke engines I have been told by my dealer to run them hard on occasion to keep the power head clean. It is also a good way to know if the motor is putting out 100%. This must be a widely held notion because a friend with a Optimax had his dealer tell him he was not running it hard enough. Apparently the smart gages can record the percentage the motor has been run at various RPM's.

My 225 FS reaches the top of the operating range at WOT of 6000 RPM. I realize fuel economy suffers greatly at the upper range, but that is not what I am asking. Is it good to run these motors hard on occasion or is it better to baby them? Are FS motors being abused to run them WOT for periods of ten minutes?

The dealer did tell me to run Ring Free and I am doing that.

I will ask my dealer but basically that is asking one person.
__________________
Wild Bill
Wild Bill is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 07:58 PM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North East
Posts: 5,714
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

I run my Yamaha 4s hard and easy. Sometimes I run WOT for 15 minutes to get to a trolling spot and then troll for 2 hours and run 20 minutes WOT back. 240 trouble free (and ring free) hours.
FireFly is offline  
 
Old 04-17-2004, 09:03 PM
  #3    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastsound, WA, USA
Posts: 12
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

I was told by a Yamaha product engineer that you can run the new 150 4 strokes all day at WOT and that is what is best for the engine. Seems strange to me. I
think I will wait and be a little more conservative and let someone else tell me how their engine does with that type of operation.
orcas is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 09:37 PM
  #4    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 27
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

sorry for the ignorant question, but what is "ring Free" ???
wscott10 is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 09:52 PM
  #5    
Junior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 13
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Ring free prevents carbon build up on pistons and compression rings.
diveboy is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 10:46 PM
  #6    
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 70
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

What size engine is your 4 stroke?
austjj is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 11:02 PM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: farmington ct, usa
Posts: 903
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

running any combustion engine at the max is stressful

dealers love to sell new motors

when was the last time you ran your car with your foot to the floor for 10 minutes straight?

automobile car engines are running typically 25 to 30 % of max, and they do not blow powerheads like outboard 4 strokes

as long as an engine is being used in it's torque range, neither hard or easy, the better for the long run

excessive idling, ie cabs in nyc, or beating hard is not good

moderation, with some idling to warm up and cool down, with an ocasional punch to blow off some carbon makes good sense and ring free too

hope i don't get to hammered on this one
cat man is offline  
Old 04-17-2004, 11:26 PM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,605
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

IMO I go out of my way to warm it up before anything. I like moderation. I don't like WOT very much. I will run it harder on the way in like....15-20 minutes before as to "help evaporate" any fuel that may have mixed with the oil. I like cooling down too. I have a Yamaha F200.
broncobirdy is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 07:57 AM
  #9    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
Posts: 424
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Thanks for the replies. Mine is a Yamaha 225 on a 23 Parker SE. It seem to push the boat with ease and tops out at 6000 and 49 MPH with normal load of 2/3 guys and fishing gear. The load actually does not seem to make much difference in performance.

Cat man-

I am not going to hammer you at all, appreciate your answer. What you say seems logical, however, I am not sure that FS outboards are identical to typical car engines. Also the prop provides slippage that you do not have with some cars when you pop the clutch. This factor could make it a little easier on engine parts. I was told by a Yamaha rep that the engines were designed to run all day at 7000 RPM, even though they are recommending a limit at WOT of 6000.

I warm my FS up by starting it as soon as I get on board and letting it idle until everything is loaded. Also run slow for a long stretch in the marina. Cool down occurs naturally as I run back inside the marina.

Most of the time I cannot run WOT because of water conditions and most of the time I do not want to anyway because of running outside the channels in relatively shallow water.

Getting back to the car analogy, which I do not think is perfect. I once worked for a older Doctor who ran his big Olds 98 so slow his wife would give it to me and tell me to run it hard because the dealer kept telling the guy he was carboning up the 455 block with his poky driving. I was 19 years old and that was an awful job to have to hammer that big Olds.
__________________
Wild Bill
Wild Bill is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 07:58 AM
  #10    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
Posts: 424
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Thanks for the replies. Mine is a Yamaha 225 on a 23 Parker SE. It seem to push the boat with ease and tops out at 6000 and 49 MPH with normal load of 2/3 guys and fishing gear. The load actually does not seem to make much difference in performance.

Cat man-

I am not going to hammer you at all, appreciate your answer. What you say seems logical, however, I am not sure that FS outboards are identical to typical car engines. Also the prop provides slippage that you do not have with some cars when you pop the clutch. This factor could make it a little easier on engine parts. I was told by a Yamaha rep that the engines were designed to run all day at 7000 RPM, even though they are recommending a limit at WOT of 6000.

I warm my FS up by starting it as soon as I get on board and letting it idle until everything is loaded. Also run slow for a long stretch in the marina. Cool down occurs naturally as I run back inside the marina.

Most of the time I cannot run WOT because of water conditions and most of the time I do not want to anyway because of running outside the channels in relatively shallow water.

Getting back to the car analogy, which I do not think is perfect. I once worked for a older Doctor who ran his big Olds 98 so slow his wife would give it to me and tell me to run it hard because the dealer kept telling the guy he was carboning up the 455 block with his poky driving. I was 19 years old and that was an awful job to have to hammer that big Olds.
__________________
Wild Bill
Wild Bill is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 09:14 AM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cudjoe Key, FL
Posts: 345
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

I had it explained in a way that made sense to me.* The basic concept was:*

Machines are designed for ‘x’ duty cycles.* Duty cycles is a design target that says the product will work for at least a predetermined measurement, be it time, revolutions, on/off cycles, etc. under normal use which includes keeping within operating specifications and performing proper maintenance.* The designers of the equipment define normal use.* *

Operating the machine in other than normal use consumes duty cycles faster, and will shorten*its useful life.* I don’t know exactly what the designers definition of “normal” is for our outboards, but I know it isn’t to run at idle or WOT all, or even most, of the time.* *

So, if you buy the duty cycle concept, it makes sense that to do either excessively will shorten the useful life of a motor. Tom
__________________
"urbanRenewal", 1999 Glacier Bay 2670 w/ Honda 150s
My Home Page
OBX Trip Report and Pictures
OBX06 Trip Report and Pictures
UrbanRenewal is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 09:53 AM
  #12    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuart FL
Posts: 1,293
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Although I wouldn't want to do it on my own motors, I can beleieve the new 4 strokes are capable of 6000 for a long long time. Many 4 stroke motorcycle engines rev to 13,000 right off the showroom floor so 6000 to them is barely running. My belieif is one of the best benefits of 4 strokes is they are much much less likely to fail from the reasons 2 strokes fail. Carbon or fuel problems resulting in powerhead failure. 4 strokes are not known for failing due to carbon problems and why should you worry about carbon problems in a 4 stroke when it is obvious that car engines don't have any carbon isssues. Carbon issues are mainly related to 2 strokes and especially DFI 2 strokes. This is the main reason I believe 4 strokes are going to get so much more popular in the near furure. For fishing purposes a 4 stroke has no issues idling forever. Some 2 strokes do ok idling forever, but many load up, carbon up, smoke, cut cylinders out to save fuel, and they just generally are not happy idling forever. I believe 4 strokes are typically going to outlast 2 strokes by miles as time goes by. But it will probably still be a application thing that makes one type better for on application ove rthe other. Speed will always be rules by 2 strokes, but durability is probably going to be won by 4 strokes unless you are talking abuse which will then probably go back to two strokes ruling again. But for cruising and trolling a 4 stroke is just plain made for that and has never had any issues doing that. I look forward to repowering in a few years to 4 strokes and leaving the powerhead failure possibilities that are to common with two strokes. I have not heard of a single 4 stroke powerhead failure ever, I'm sure it has happened but it seems very uncommon.
grin is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 10:12 AM
  #13    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
Posts: 424
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

grin-

I asked question because I do not know for sure, but I have owned a variety of outboards for 40 years now. So I do have opinions on the topic. Your answer is the closest to what I believe.

The way I look at it is that if my WOT is 6000, it should not hurt to run it 4000 to 4500 at cruise. That is faster than I ran my TS's but they topped out at about 5000 RPM. AT 4500 I am running 35 MPH and still have 1500 more RPM to WOT. Time will tell. The five year warranty is comforting. Will probably replace the motor or entire rig between four and five years. Yesterday I had occasion to want to get somewhere in a hurry and ran about ten minutes at WOT. That will be pretty rare.
Wild Bill is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 10:39 AM
  #14    
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: southport nc
Posts: 33
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

i am probably wrong but i thought they goverened the two strokes much like
disels. so they want turn but so high ....... maybe it s just what i wanted to
hear so i can run it as hard as i want

just my .02 worth

john
never hesitate is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 10:57 AM
  #15    
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mandeville, La.
Posts: 70
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

can't remeber what forum this came from, but the topic was about breaking in 4-strokes and how to run them.
This web page came up.
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
Hangten is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 03:34 PM
  #16    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ & FL
Posts: 12,408
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

I agree with a lot of what I just read. I remember the first time I saw that cut away F225 in Miami, I thought there's way too much stuff in there to break... I also noted how few powerhead failures I hear of with them, and I do believe it'd make headlines on any one of the forums when it does happen. I haven't run mine WOT continously for more than 5 minutes or so, but I do cruise at 4500-5000 and think little of it. I buy the importance of warm-up, I think it's most important thing I do for the motor every time I use it... All those parts, a lot of different materials, all with tolerances designed for 'operating temperature'...

As for the car analagy, okay, I buy into the lack of need for ring free, but I still will use it as prescribed. But beyond that, I don't know. I figure 5000-6000rpm on the boat is the max load I give it.. But on my Tahoe, I think towing the boat back and forth from NJ to FL at 79.5mph is the hardest work it ever does (fuel consumption proves it too ) and it is only turning like 2300rpm...

I gotta think the car engine and the outboard engineers did their homework, they both work.
So much for y $.02
__________________
Mike
http://www.thehulltruth.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=17887&dateline=132844  6335

Livin the dream...
Afishinado is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 04:46 PM
  #17    
ko
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Posts: 635
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

A factory rep told me that my TLDI 90s love to "run hot."
ko is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 05:42 PM
  #18    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: st augustine fl
Posts: 4,390
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Most engines have an "operating range" that is set by the manufacturer, that is the rpm range that most of your boating should be done in, cruising, etc....WOT occasionally is OK and can help in blowing out carbon etc, to run all the time WOT isn't a good idea, either for economy or longevity....Mick
slickster is offline  
Old 04-18-2004, 11:07 PM
  #19    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 530
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

Trip Yamaha F225's, WOT as often as possible. Made a couple of 120 mile runs(each way) wide open. No problems.
kbarker is offline  
Old 04-19-2004, 01:24 PM
  #20    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA USA
Posts: 424
Default RE: Four Strokes--Run em Hard or Run em Easy?

kbarker-

WOW! Must have been an exciting ride. What is your reasoning for running the four strokes WOT so long. Not being argumentative. Just trying to learn. Is Yamaha a sponsor of yours that provides the engines?
__________________
Wild Bill
Wild Bill is offline  
 
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
will Yamaha 4 strokes run on this gas? signmansez The Boating Forum 5 08-22-2007 03:44 PM
Is it hard on the engine to run out of gas? nmall The Boating Forum 41 12-29-2005 11:09 AM
Mercury Verado.......run Forest, run........ TheBoatGuy The Boating Forum 117 03-19-2004 06:46 PM
How far do you run? RiptideCharters The Boating Forum 46 02-23-2004 10:02 PM
To run out of gas or not to run out of gas...That is my question. fafafouy The Boating Forum 24 02-15-2004 08:28 PM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0