This is a real scenario I would like to get some opinions on. I recently demo’ed a SeaWolf 30’ (
www.seawolfmarine.com in WA), and am considering getting one built. They have two power options, both costing the same amount, a Volvo Penta D6-370 or twin Yamaha 225’s. It seems like the majority of the boats up here have outboards. I am interested in any opinions and if I am missing something.
Volvo Penta D6 350HP (the new ones are 370HP, but the performance should be similar)
Top speed 36 kts
24.7kts 9gph = 2.74 kmph or 3.15 mpg
27.3kts 10gph = 2.73 kmpg or 3.14 mpg
200 Gallons = 680 mile range
Pros:
Single motor for less things to go wrong. All information I have gotten on this motor is that it is very reliable.
Great fuel economy, and therefore great range and lower operating costs.
Some say that the inboard diesel rides better, since the weight is lower and farther forward.
Some complain about the smell and exhaust smoke. These common rail motors are amazing. They are relatively quiet, and I never even saw a puff of exhaust or smelled diesel fumes.
Cons:
I noticed a slight vibration when turning, which I was told was the U-joints and this is normal
Single motor, so I would be relying on the 8HP kicker if there was a major failure. This in itself is not bad, but it only as a 9 gal tank for gasoline, so it would have limited return range unless you put a larger tank in, or carried extra gas. I have also hear that there are diesel kickers, but the only one I could find was a Yanmar that is no longer being manufactured.
Outdrive, risk of failures, leaks, etc.
Twin Outboards 225 (These are from a Etecs. I think the Yamaha’s would be similar)
Top speed 40+ kts
28kts 17 gph 1.89 mpg
200 gallons = 378 mile range
Weight approximately 1100lbs less, could carry 150 gallons extra fuel, for a total range of 660 miles.
Pros:
Redundant power source, although I don’t think you could get on step with one motor.
Twin motors allow a bit better tight quarters handeling, but the VP duoprop outdrive is suppose to be really good, since it has dual counter rotating props.
No winterizing, at least on the motors, although the water and other systems on the boat would still have to be winterized.
Lighter weight, by about 1100 lbs (if I don’t put a bunch more fuel on board for additional range.
Easier repairs and maintenance, and eventual replacement.
Cons:
The mileage.
The motors in the way while fishing.
I want a rear helm station, and for this to work I would have to have electronic controls, which is a $7K option.
Boat Use: This will be a personal use boat for me and my family, hopefully for many years. I want to be able to go to Seward, Homer and Whittier Alaska on occasion. I may want to go to Southeast Alaska at some point, but the main use would be weekend trips within 100 miles of port. The boat will be stored on a trailer.
Any comments? Are the outboards easy access, redundancy and no winterization really worth the hit in fuel economy?
Jim