The Hull Truth


Go Back   The Hull Truth > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum

Notices

Random Quote: yea who belives in fortune cookie belives in everything
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2007, 09:55 AM
  #1    
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 59
Default Single vs. Twins

I own a 1997 2320 Robalo CC. It is currently powered by twin 115 carbed Mercs. I am debating with the year of the hull against the cost and security of twin 150hp with the lesser cost of one 250hp. I am deciding between E-tec and Suzuki as well... I would prefer to spend less and buy one engine but do not want to be regretting the performance later. The boat weighs about 4400lbs. dry???? I live in Tampa / St. Pete and mostly offshore fish and dive???
robolito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 10:01 AM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,851
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

I own a Robalo 2420 with a single 250 opti. I wish it had twins, and if I decide to re-power (vs sell) I will definitely switch to a twin set up.
__________________
Move along, nothing to see here.
RI Builder is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 05-16-2007, 10:12 AM
  #3    
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 59
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Exactly my thought ....Repower or Sell????
robolito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:19 PM
  #4    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 141
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

you will gain power and speed with a single 250 versus 2 115 mercs. Less weight and drag. BUT, its now a single engine boat!!! Only you can decide whats more important to you.
moschoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:23 PM
  #5    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montauk, NY
Posts: 282
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

I'd recommend selling it off and buying a new (different) boat with twins, if there's a way for you to swing it.
Kilo Papa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:32 PM
  #6    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 267
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Quote:
Kilo Papa - 5/16/2007 2:23 PM

I'd recommend selling it off and buying a new (different) boat with twins, if there's a way for you to swing it.
I'd recommend the exact opposite.It's a great boat and I think even twin 140 Suzukis would be an excellent choice.They are on my 2440 Robalo which is a heavier 25 foot cuddy with hardtop.Tops out at 45MPH and cruises nice at mid 30s.
Greygoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:34 PM
  #7    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: marysville wa
Posts: 858
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

i you cant go twins , get a 250 opti or the f 250 yami ,
__________________
If its on the back it better be mecury black because the race never ends .

2 stroke because 4 strokes are 2 to many and 1 is not enough

yes your suzuki has tons of toqure because its geared high enough to make a weed eater pull a house .!!!! Did you change your oil yet boy ???
lugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:43 PM
  #8    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 220
Default RE: Single vs. Twins

It's simple. If you own twins, they are a must safety-wise, and anyone that goes out without 'em is a suicidal nutcase.

If you own a single, twins, because of their added cost, drag and maintenance, are for suckers.

Seriously, the twins vs. single debate will never be resolved, but I don't think twin 150's will give you much, if any, performance boost over a single 250. The twins' added drag and weight will offset their 50 extra ponies.

TheFloater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:49 PM
  #9    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa FL 813-286-8344
Posts: 1,687
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Single and a seatow membership, if your in Tampa/St Pete you need to call these guys, American Marine in Tarpon. Had a lady on FS call every dealer in the state for an Etec, dealer in Key Largo and these guys were the cheapest. They also have a deal on a new 225 DI Rude so be sure and ask about that $$$, thats what she ended up buying he had 3 down to 1. 727 938 9796 Mike or Mario
__________________
The Boaters Mortgage guy
1976 SeaCraft 20 Master Angler/200 Merc XRi
eggsuckindog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 04:11 PM
  #10    
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 48
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

i have a 1997 Robalo 2320 that currently has twin Merc 150s, will be dropping it off on Friday to have new Etec 150s put on it....will let you know how is rides in a week or so.
__________________
-------------------------------------------
1997 Robalo 2320 - Twin 2007 E-Tec 150s

Don't spread my wealth..spread my work ethic!

Obama - Because everyone deserves some of what you've worked hard for!
cprice1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 04:14 PM
  #11    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 157
Default RE: Single vs. Twins

Quote:
robolito - 5/16/2007 8:55 AM

I own a 1997 2320 Robalo CC. It is currently powered by twin 115 carbed Mercs. I am debating with the year of the hull against the cost and security of twin 150hp with the lesser cost of one 250hp. I am deciding between E-tec and Suzuki as well... I would prefer to spend less and buy one engine but do not want to be regretting the performance later. The boat weighs about 4400lbs. dry???? I live in Tampa / St. Pete and mostly offshore fish and dive???
Twins - Why? they look so much cooler hanging off the back than a single.
ohiost90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 04:16 PM
  #12    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gulf Coast, FL
Posts: 634
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

How about a single Suzuki 300?
__________________
If it ain't broke; don't break it.
q3131a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 05:46 PM
  #13    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 521
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Well the twins debate is standard.

Bottom line is if you HAVE twins, you will never be happy giving up the second motor. You will always look back at every noise, every shake, every hiccup and wonder if your single is going to shut down on you and leave you drifting, powerless.

Nothing wrong with singles, I ran single powered boats but now I have twins and know there is no going back.
__________________
All boats are cool.
Local Motion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 06:46 PM
  #14    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 220
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

I think the big single plus kicker plus Vessel Assist solution makes the most sense, but if your hull requires more than 300 HP, this is not an option.

I agree that twins look better and that they have a slightly higher level of safety, but it comes with some significant downside, i.e., more cost, more weight, more drag and near double maintenance cost.
TheFloater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 07:33 PM
  #15    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 521
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Quote:
TheFloater - 5/16/2007 5:46 PM

I think the big single plus kicker plus Vessel Assist solution makes the most sense, but if your hull requires more than 300 HP, this is not an option.

I agree that twins look better and that they have a slightly higher level of safety, but it comes with some significant downside, i.e., more cost, more weight, more drag and near double maintenance cost.
I have never even used a kicker but I am trying to imagine a 10hp motor doing something positive in a current? Inlets are where a shut down motor can cost you the boat and your life, been real close once in years past when a motor shut down on me, not a good position to be in. A kicker would have done me no good witht hat 23 footer, in a minute I was right there 25 feet from the rocks, no time for anything but another boater who saw me jump over my windshield with a crab net to try to hold the boat off the rocks and threw me a line. 1 minute at the wrong time is all it took to almost lose the boat. Sea tow and all that stuff sounds great and is great under most circumstances but the inlets are a place where the value of twins pays for the extra expense. With my old twins, I popped a powerhead 15 miles offshore on my way to going 35 miles out, that second motor got me home. Tow insurance doesn't mean they will come and get ya, weather can change and keep them from going out, something esle to keep in mind if you are an offshore traveler.

I know money is a big thing, I waited many years to be able to afford a boat with twins. No turning back for me.
Local Motion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 07:56 PM
  #16    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 220
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

I'm looking at it from a West Coast perspective. We don't really have inlets, at least not like yours, nor do we have thunderstorms.

Out west, if you lose an engine, you can get home at 6 knots with your kicker, or you can get home at 15 knots with the remaining twin. Given that it is fairly rare to lose an engine, and given the aforementioned disadvantages of twins, I'll take the kicker. If I lived on the Atlantic or Gulf Coast, I might look at it differently.

While you may not be able to shoot the Golden Gate or Columbia River Bar at peak current with a kicker, if you wait 2 or three hours, you'll be fine.
TheFloater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 08:15 PM
  #17    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 403
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

seems to me there might be a bit of ill informed statements here, twin (say) 125HP will always be more powerfull than a single 250HP, but the single will be faster, but if they where to be hooked up "back to back" the twins will pull the single backwards easy as pie! it is that simple, for ease of getting on the plane and heavy loads twins will always be first choice (or more of course)
noelm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 08:19 PM
  #18    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 220
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

I'll keep that in mind when I'm outfitting my tug-o-war boat.
TheFloater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 08:37 PM
  #19    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 197
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Just went from twin inboards to a single outboard. 1/2 the maintenance. 1/2 the worry. 1/2 the risk my boating trip will be ruined by a mechanical problem. I am glad I made the switch.

ski doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 08:45 PM
  #20    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,166
Default Re: Single vs. Twins

Buddy just repowered his 24 WA with a single 250 4 stroke. It's quiet, economical and FAST! He loves it! The only thing I want twins on is an airplane.
__________________
I know I used to have a memory but I forget what I did with it.
plugmeister is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From a single to twins! trackerputnam The Boating Forum 9 12-18-2008 06:39 AM
Twins or single OB Dale B The Boating Forum 8 02-08-2006 01:49 AM
twins or single? CHopppyWaters The Boating Forum 1 07-10-2005 01:42 PM
Twins or Single? MarVista Man The Boating Forum 17 04-15-2005 04:40 PM
Twins vs Single Charlie dawg The Boating Forum 12 11-23-2003 11:33 AM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0