The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Women, wine, fishing, and deciept make the will great and the want neverending. What it takes to maintain one vice is enough to raise two children.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2007, 09:13 PM
  #1    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 23
Default Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

Anyone have any experience with either or these boats, specifically the ride, and the usual stuff. I plan on Twin F225 Yamaha's for both.
RiverBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 09:30 PM
  #2    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 932
Default RE: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

Quote:
RiverBoy - 3/7/2007 8:13 PM

Anyone have any experience with either or these boats, specifically the ride, and the usual stuff. I plan on Twin F225 Yamaha's for both.
The F250 weigh the same as the F225 (< 10 pounds difference) and produce much more than the apparent 25 HP difference. The performance and ride on a 2660 with F250s is hard to beat ... but I have not rode a Mako.
cowdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 03-07-2007, 09:39 PM
  #3    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 23
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

Your very right, the only reason i wrote it like that was with the mako twin 225's are the biggest you can run based on the boats horse power rating. The sailfish will accept the 250's.
RiverBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 10:52 PM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 3,715
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

To the best of my knowledge, Mako does not rig with Yamaha: From thesir website:
Available Power
Mercury® OptiMax®
225 XXL OptiMax®
Twin 135 XL OptiMax®
Twin 150 XL OptiMax®
Twin 200 XL DTS OptiMax®
Twin 200 XL OptiMax®
TWIN 225 XL DTS Optimax®
Mercury® Verado
225 XXL Verado™
250 XXL Verado™
275 XXL Verado™
Twin 135 XL Verado™
Twin 150 XL Verado™
Twin 175 XL Verado™
TWIN 200 XL Verado
TWIN 225 XL Verado
Honda
BF225A7XXA
TWIN 150 (25")
TWIN 200 (25")
TWIN 225 (25")
TWIN 135 (25")
Suzuki
DF225TXXK7
DF250TXXK7
Twin 140 (25")
Twin 150 (25")
Twin 175 (25")
TWIN 200 (25")
Twin 225 (25")
Bombardier
E225DPZSU ETEC
E250DPZSU ETEC
Twin E150 ETEC (25")
Twin E175 ETEC (25")
Twin E200 ETEC (25")
Twin E200 ETEC (25") HO
Twin E225 ETEC (25")
__________________
makosteve66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:01 PM
  #5    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 23
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

ok guys lets not worry about the power lets concentrate on the performance of the hull and how it relates to the sailfish. Thanks.
RiverBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:07 PM
  #6    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 172
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

I’ve been looking at boats in that price range for a while now and have come to the conclusion that the Sailfish is by far the most boat for the buck. The Mako has kinda taken a hit in the reputation dept lately. Do a search on here for both boats and see what others have to say.
__________________
Sailfish 2660CC / F150s
http://alfishing.blogspot.com/
Calmday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:10 PM
  #7    
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: jacksonville fl
Posts: 82
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

i just bought a 2007 266 with f250s and it is bad to the bone i only go three hours on the engines because i just recevied the boat this past weekend. i done the break in period on it and traveled 30 miles and burned 13 gallons i had a full tank of gas. i cruised most of the day in the mid 30s . at the end of the day i got on it a little more a saw 51 mph at 5000 rpms it felt like it was only at 3 quarter throttle. it rides awesome.
butlerbay27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:15 PM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 3,715
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

never been on a sailfish, but they appear to be ncicely laid out. I think that the bad rap Mako has taken is not deserved - from my experiences - they seem to care and the facory has reached out to me as an owner. If i have a ? I have an answer in less than 24 hours. The boat has performed well
__________________
makosteve66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:15 PM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 341
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

Mako's come pre-rigged with yamaha controls and your dealer installs the engines for you.
shrug1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:16 PM
  #10    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 729
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

I will not go there. FishCop???Dont hate the Hull...Hate the poster.
LostShaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:24 PM
  #11    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 729
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

I own a 2360 Sail and I love it. I have run a 26 Mako and cant say enough about how dry and smooth it was. I was raised with Mako and cant say a word bad about them. Having run both boats in very ruff conditions I would have to give the nod to the sail in a head sea with chop and overall ride quality but, the Mako for being a tank and built like a brick... Always will be a special place for Mako!
LostShaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 01:08 AM
  #12    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 2
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

butlerbay27,
I'm looking at a 266 but with 150s.
From what I've been reading, there is not much diff in performance from 150s to 250s other than speed, but you sacrifice a lot more fuel.
Do you think you made the right choice with the 250s, or if you saved $6000-8000 (at least) you would have bought the 150s ?
thx
OneGoodSpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:48 AM
  #13    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GEORGIA
Posts: 935
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

Quote:
OneGoodSpy - 4/10/2007 12:08 AM

butlerbay27,
I'm looking at a 266 but with 150s.
From what I've been reading, there is not much diff in performance from 150s to 250s other than speed, but you sacrifice a lot more fuel.
Do you think you made the right choice with the 250s, or if you saved $6000-8000 (at least) you would have bought the 150s ?
thx
Look at Yamahas performance bulletin. Not any difference in fuel at the same speeds. After having ridden in BOTH. I would still get the 250s. Loaded for bear, it still jumps on plane easily. Plus, I can plane (at 35 mph to boot) with one engine.
__________________
Everglades 290 Pilot
15' Whaler, 1976
surveyingdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 09:40 AM
  #14    
Admirals Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 172
Default Re: Sailfish 2660 cc vs Mako 264 cc

I just got my 2660CC home last week and all I can say is awesome. I love this boat. The Mako is one of the other boats that I looked at and took a ride in. There is a difference in the ride. It’s not a huge difference but Sailfish is a better ride especially in 2’-3’ chop. I didn’t get the opportunity to run the Mako in anything bigger than that but the Sailfish was very impressive in the bigger stuff (3’-5’ offshore). I think that the biggest thing that put me off to the Mako was when I looked inside of unfinished areas and saw all of the fiberglass sticking out all over the place and spots that didn’t even get paint on them. If you ever had to do any work in the aft bilge area your arms would get all scratched up. I also figured that if the workmanship was that bad in this area what was the quality of everything else? This was kinda disappointing for me because I spent a lot of days off shore with my Dad on a Mako and that was a great boat.
I researched for over a year and looked at every boat in this price range including used high end boats and every time I kept coming back to the Sailfish. I looked at ride, performance, quality, fit/finish, resale value, factory support, lay out, range, economics of operation and owner satisfaction. I am very happy with the decision that I made.
__________________
Sailfish 2660CC / F150s
http://alfishing.blogspot.com/
Calmday is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new 264 mako w/200 optis my2sons The Boating Forum 3 02-10-2009 12:24 PM
Mako 264 Walkaround putz18 The Boating Forum 0 06-21-2007 01:26 PM
Sea Hunt 260 vs Sailfish 2660 vs Mako 264 vs Key West 268 Onewolf The Boating Forum 9 04-01-2007 11:09 PM
seaswirl 2601 vs Mako 264 jwb The Boating Forum 3 02-25-2007 12:28 PM
mako 264 jwb The Boating Forum 1 02-06-2007 12:06 AM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0