The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum


Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum

Notices

Random Quote: Life isn't cheap!
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2003, 01:29 PM
  #1    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Zephyrhills,Fl.USA
Posts: 252
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

I have a 26'Twin Vee Hawaiian Fisherman with a big half tower, powered by twin 140 hp 2 stroke Suzuki's. My boat is always heavy loaded with people and dive gear, sometimes 16 scuba tanks and 6 divers.
At 4500 rpm I am running about 26 knots and burning 10.6 gallons per side, or about 22 gph. according to my flow scan.
A chart on the Suzuki web site shows the 4 stroke 140 as burning only 6.5 gph at fast cruise, and the 140 2 stroke burning 10.6 gph at the same rpm. and running the same speed.
If this is accurate, I want to re-power tomorrow. But, OMC taught me a long time ago to not trust advertising copy.
Anyone with first hand experience care to confirm these numbers? Sounds too good to be true.
capt.gene is offline  
Old 06-30-2003, 05:41 AM
  #2    
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carrabelle,Fl.
Posts: 57
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

Capt. Gene,
Earlier in the posts there is a post on Suzuki 140 where different owners talk about the engine, performance and its fuel burn. I would contact several of those folks to get the answers you want. The 140's are good engines and much improved over the 140 two strokes which are punched out 115's.
Chuck B
Chuck B is offline  
 
Old 06-30-2003, 09:17 AM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Porter Tx USA
Posts: 360
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

Those number should be very accurate.

Team Binnion
Fish Hard or Go Home/24 Cape Horn
Team Binnion is offline  
Old 06-30-2003, 05:25 PM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fuquay/Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,603
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

Based on my experience after a few weeks of owning a pair of DF140's those numbers look pretty accurate.

Dennis
23' Yellowfin
SeaPA is offline  
Old 06-30-2003, 07:22 PM
  #5    
AW
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 43
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

I have the Suzuki 140 4-stroke on a Polar Bay 1910. It weighs about 3000 lbs. loaded. I get such good gas milage that I tap the gas gauge to see if it broke.
AW is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 08:04 AM
  #6    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Columbia,S.C.
Posts: 3,043
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

the 140 4 stroke should be 25 to 30 % better than the 2 stroke 140.
SCAngler is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 09:10 AM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sarasota, FL, USA
Posts: 1,230
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

seapa,

What is your top end and cruising speeds on your Yellowfin?

Thanks,
Finbox
finbox is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 09:10 AM
  #8    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 413
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

Capt Gene -

Your 2 stroke motors may have tuning or other issues. I have a 29' Stamas with twin 250 two strokes and I get 22gph (total for both motors) at 33mph. At 28mph I am under 18gph. I would expect your boat to do much better than that even with 2 strokes.
FishEye is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 09:12 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Beach, MS
Posts: 5,183
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

I went to the suzuki website... there performance numbers with the 140 4-stroke are NO better than what I get now.. with 150 carbed yamaha's..... interesting.

BlueMarlin is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 12:43 PM
  #10    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fuquay/Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,603
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

Top end with a light load is 49, the boat really loves to run and seems to cruise comfortably between 34-37 mph with little variation in fuel usage.

Dennis
23' Yellowfin
SeaPA is offline  
Old 07-01-2003, 01:43 PM
  #11    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Beach, MS
Posts: 5,183
Default Suzuki 140 fuel burn, 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke

thats a sweet looking ride Dennis.

The lines kinda remind me of a 24 or 27 cape horn....
BlueMarlin is offline  
 
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suzuki 140 4 Stroke vs Yamaha 150 4 Stroke aceunderwood The Boating Forum 14 07-09-2010 03:01 PM
97 suzuki 140 2 stroke. rockn n rollin The Boating Forum 0 08-13-2006 09:53 PM
suzuki 140 4 stroke cape nut The Boating Forum 2 08-21-2005 02:51 AM
140 Suzuki Four Stroke Jerry Blake The Boating Forum 4 01-28-2005 11:27 PM
suzuki 4 stroke 140 smmoothc The Boating Forum 44 04-21-2003 06:31 AM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0