The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum

Go Back   The Hull Truth - Boating and Fishing Forum > BOATING FORUMS > The Boating Forum
Search

Notices

Random Quote: If it smells like fish, its a good dish. If it smells like cologne leave it alone.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2003, 09:10 PM
  #1    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 10
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

First time posting, and could really use some help. Just ordered boat and trying to decide
between Mercury 60 Four strokes and Yamaha 60
four strokes. Yammies are 2k more for twins.
Are they worth the extra $. Plan on keeping boat
for loooong time.Don't mind paying extra 2k if
Yammies will outperform over the long run.Would
appreciate any helpful info. Really enjoy reading
the forums. Thanks in advance.
Timeout2 is offline  
Old 05-17-2003, 09:37 PM
  #2    
Admirals Club Captains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Slidell, LA, USA
Posts: 1,228
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Hope someone will back me up one this, but all indications are the Mercs are Yamahas with a black cover ... in other words the Mercs are made by Yamaha, just like the Johnson 4 strokes are made by Suzuki.

-------------------------------------
Fishin-Fanatic
Get In! Sit Down! Shut Up! Hold On!
fishin-fanatic is offline  
 
Old 05-17-2003, 10:13 PM
  #3    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,715
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

I think fishin-fanatic may very well be right. At the least, I think the Merc 4-stroke is a Yam up top and possibly a Merc lower unit. Someone with more definite knowledge will hopefully chime in. What boat did you order?


Drifter
Drifter is offline  
Old 05-17-2003, 10:37 PM
  #4    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 5,071
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Merc & Yam may have gone their separate ways on the 60 Hp 4 stroke from yr2002 or 2003 engines - could be wrong tho - you could easily tell probably bye comparing their respective spec sheets (bore & stroke) from the web sites most likely.

Don't merc n yam use a different injection system from each other?

i.e. Merc bought the sarich orbital technologys digital low pressure injection technology while Yam went with HPDI.?

Is this the difference?

i.e - is the block still Yam while the injection mechanics varies between the two as does the merc leg with bigfoot options etc?

I would imagine this may be what your looking at.

For what it's worth, I believe Mercs using the Sarich Orbital technologies injection mechamism to be better than YAMS HPDI - yet both are undoubtedly good & reliable.

I beleive Merc to make the better lower units - and also have the bigfoot options available.

Yam may have better customer service than Merc.

So - there you go - your between the devil and the deep blue sea.

For what it's worth, a Maori girl once told me - "Once you've had black - you'll never go back" and I assumed she was talking about Merc And Yam OB engines!!

Cheers!


trouty is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 12:36 AM
  #5    
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 73
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Timeout2,

I am not sure who makes what on those two motors, but the biggest diference that I see is that the Mercury has EFI and the Yamaha has carbs.

I also thought that except for the 225, they just shared blocks. That is quite a bit different than the Suzuki - Johnson relationship.

Kelly
Kelly is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 07:13 AM
  #6    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Isle of Palms, SC
Posts: 16
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Why don't you just get one 115 yamaha? Two engines mean twice the problems. What are you putting twin 60's on?
lowcountrytiger is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 07:16 AM
  #7    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Whitt, TX, USA
Posts: 868
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

They share a block, BUT.

The Merc has EFI, the Yamaha is carbed.

An entire generation of technology difference.

Red sky at night. . .
JB
J.B. Cornwell is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 07:23 AM
  #8    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 10
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Buying a 20 ft. Twin vee. Have 2 boats, and trying
to find one boat that can fish lakes, bays, and
near shore on good days. I know you can't find
one boat to do it all, but after much research
Twin Vee 20 is what I found. They don't recommend
single engine----but twins.
Timeout2 is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 07:42 AM
  #9    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 5,071
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

That makes sense.

Do you think twin 60's will be enough horses for the 20 ft Twin V cat boat?

I woulda thought it might handle say twin 100's?

Of course if speed isn't a concern and fuel economy (and initial purchase price) are considerations - then twin 60's should be OK.

I think Bro in laws 19 ft monohull had a single 140, and he felt it could do with more horses in some cases (like a following sea where it'd fall off the back of the swell all the time).

Sometimes these cats are a whisker heavier than a mono - and need more horses, and if 140 wasn't quite enough on 19ft of mono - I have some "reservations" about total 120 horses (twin 60's) being sufficient HP for a 20 ft Twin v.

I guess it might, but you know how it is - sometimes more horses used more sparingly is actually more fuel efficient than fewer horses worked hard all the time.

Say you wan't to plane home on one engine - is a 60 4 stroke Merc going to plane 20 ft of twin V cat?

I'd think thru your power options carefully - sometimes dealers want to sell you an underpowered boat to make the total package cost look cheaper / more affordable, knowing that once you have a year or so in using the boat and have added a couple fishing buddies and all sorts of gear extra fuel etc - that you'll be back wanting to buy two new larger engines - in which case - the dealer wins again.

Better IMHO to get enough horses at the get go - and the selections in 100HP range might give you a clearer choice between one or another brand maybe.

Whats the Max HP rating on a 20ft twin V ?

Just food for thought!

Cheers!


trouty is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 10:00 AM
  #10    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: st augustine fl
Posts: 5,779
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

The max horsies on the Twin Vee 20 is 140, twin 60's should work well, the main consideration when buying mercs or yammies is the dealer support.is the dealer nearby and helpful?? are they factory trained?? is there parts support??really an issue when the bugs appear..both motors will work well, I prefer fuel injection, I think they are both injected actually, I have a twin vee 19 and am thinking of moving up to a 20 soon, while the 20 is no speed demon, the thing to consider is "usable speed". On flat calm days 40 is nice, here on the chesapeake, 20mph is more typical and fast enough for me, fuel mileage is becoming more of an issue also, I get between 4 and 5 mpg, suzuki 115, I have not talked to a single 20 owner that complained of low top speed, just reports of dry comfortable ride 30 miles offshore...good luck..Mic
slickster is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 10:17 AM
  #11    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Patuxent River, MD
Posts: 223
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

JBCornwell has it right: the Yam is carburated, the Merc is injected - other than that, the mechanical differences are negligible.
boneman is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 11:08 AM
  #12    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Posts: 10
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

I wanted to go with twin 70's to max out HP,
but in checking out manufactuers, Suzuki was only
one to have 70's. The weight of their 60 & 70
are the same, and they are about 100 lbs heavier
than either Mercury or Yamaha. With twins, that
is 200 pounds more on transom. Hopefully the
twin 60 Mercs or Yamahas at the lesser weight
will even out with heavier twin Suzuki 70's.
The dealer told me he has had a Twin Vee 20
with Mercury twin 60's run 40-41 mph. I'm not
in to speed, but I don't mind a little extra
when it is time to go to the house when bad
weather is approaching.
From the much valued info from you guys, it
looks like the extra 2k the Yammies would cost
would be better spent on electronics,etc. There
doesn't seem that there is alot of difference
between the Yammies & Mercs, but the Mercs have
fuel injection and a 2k savings. The dealer did
tell me that the 2 K difference was mostly in
the gauges and twin engine rigging. I really
appreciate the info, this is a great board. I'm
sure I'll have more questions later. Thanks
again from up here in rainy north Georgia.
Timeout2 is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 11:15 AM
  #13    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 5,071
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

If you decide to go with the Mercs, maybe do a search on here for smartcraft gauges...I seem to remember a thread with some potential problems with twin rigs running the smartcraft gauges, can't remember all the details, something about 2 new engines and one would accept the smartcraft and one wouldn't or something.

Anyway - check into it - you don't wanna strike the sanme problem this poor bugger had.

I think from memor - while they were bioth new engines - one came off the assembly line a fair while before the other, and hadn't been assembled to take the new digital guages or something.

Good luck.


trouty is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 11:59 AM
  #14    
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Iberia, La. USA
Posts: 8
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

I currently own the Yamaha 60 hp Enduro. That is by far the best motor I have ever owned. I would think that the 4 stroke would only be better.
26 Outrage is offline  
Old 05-18-2003, 01:41 PM
  #15    
ko
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Posts: 635
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Maybe with minimum fuel and one person and no t-top. I do have a friend who has a Merc 60 4-stroke and he loves it, says it puts out a good amount of power. Twin Vees with twin Honda 50s (less cubin inches, less power) only get low 30s WOT. It is hard to beleive a jump of 20 total HP will get you 8 to 10 more miles per hour. If the dealer has rigged these before, ask for the name of an owner you can contact. If you are not stuck on a 4-stroke, the Nissan/Tohatsu TLDI 70 weighs more than the Merc 60, but less than the Suzuki 70. It has a good bit more cubic inches than the Merc 60 and has a 4-year warranty.
ko is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 10:53 AM
  #16    
Admirals Club Captains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Slidell, LA, USA
Posts: 1,228
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

I ran a Twin Vee 20 with twin (light, 231 lb) 2-stroke 70 HP Tohatsu's and WOT (with a t-top) is 36-37 MPH. I'd say 40-41 with the twin 60's ... even w/o t-top is a stretch.

You can not make the Twin Vee 20 a fast boat even with the lightest 2-stroke 70's.

I'm sure I'll hear the wrath for this, but I'd order is without motors and find someone that will install 90's for you. If you do, they'llhave to be light 90's like the carbed Yami or carbed Merc ... both around 250 lbs. And be ready to set up an auxillary fuel system, cause you're not going real far with standard fuel capacity of 36 gals. Range should be OK with the twin 60 4-strokes, though, but I can't imagine you'd have a WOT of over 33-35 MPH.

One last thing ... the ride is awesome.

-------------------------------------
Fishin-Fanatic
Get In! Sit Down! Shut Up! Hold On!
fishin-fanatic is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 11:16 AM
  #17    
Senior MemberCaptains Club MemberPLEDGER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boat Jupiter/Home PBG
Posts: 2,643
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Timeout2, why not a Honda? Honda has been making the lower horsepower 4 strokes for years, Yamaha and Mercury are new to the 4 stroke world. I have the F225 Yamaha and absolutely love it! As far as the Merc/Yammie issue, I would go with the Yamaha because I am partial. Partial, but hopefully not ignorant! Honda has built a 4 stroke for quite a while now and you will be hard pressed to find anything negative about them! Just an idea!

[This message was edited by Parker at the bar! on 05-19-03 at 02:27 PM.]
Blue C's is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 11:22 AM
  #18    
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Patuxent River, MD
Posts: 223
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

Fishin-fanatic has got a point: that Yammie 90hp (2-stroke, carb) is one lightweight unit that delivers plenty of umph!!! On the downside, there's also the fuel consumption issue to consider...
boneman is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 03:23 PM
  #19    
Admirals Club Captains Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Slidell, LA, USA
Posts: 1,228
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

The speed and range will only come into play if you run relatively long distances by boat on a regular basis. I owned the Twin Vee 20 W/T-70's for 13 months and this was my experience: 90% of the time I ran @ 4300-4500 RPM's making 27-28 MPH and burning 9 GPH. With my standard fuel capacity of 36 G, this gave me a range of 4 hrs running or about 100 mi (leaving a small cushion). I never went faster cause it burned too much fuel. When it was very rough, I ran at about 3800 RPM's making 20-21 MPH.

I live on the water and a full tank was good for 3 trips when I fished near the house. But when we fished out of Venice, LA where long runs are common, or a ran to the barrier islands by boat, I brought an additional 40 G in twin 20 G fuel cells in front of each motor. This effectively doubled the range.

I did not upgrade from 70's to 90's for several reasons, but the cost ($5K) was the primary one. The next biggest reason is it exceeds the max recommended HP, the next was the added fuel consumption. In my opinion, the weight of the engines is the primary factor in max HP rating the Twin Vee 20. If you weight the transom down too much the scuppers go under and you no longer have a self-bailing boat.

If it can handle twin Suzi 70's 4-strokes @ 335 lbs each, it can handle the following 2-stroke motors:

Merc 90 carb @ 305 lbs
Yami 90 carb @ 261 lbs
Nissan 90 TLDI @ 314 lbs
Johnson 90 carb @ 335 lbs

Good Luck

-------------------------------------
Fishin-Fanatic
Get In! Sit Down! Shut Up! Hold On!
fishin-fanatic is offline  
Old 05-19-2003, 04:34 PM
  #20    
Senior MemberCaptains Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: farmington ct, usa
Posts: 903
Default Mercury 60 Four Stroke vs. Yamaha 60 Four Stroke

The 19 is 95% the boat as the 20.

The 19 can run on one single engine with some much better #s all around. ( save you some money and have a go fast boat too! )

The ride is about the same.

Just have a leaner installed instead of the cooler seat thing.
cat man is offline  
 
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yamaha 150 - 4 stroke vs Mercury 115 - 4 stroke BARNEGATBAYMAN The Boating Forum 6 01-23-2008 06:10 AM
Mercury 2-Stroke Oil in a Yamaha 2-Stroke? Split Shot - Mike The Boating Forum 16 01-03-2008 01:14 PM
Yamaha 4 stroke Vs Mercury Verado Wahzoo The Boating Forum 13 11-06-2007 04:08 PM
Help Yamaha or Mercury 4 or 2 Stroke Pontoon Man The Boating Forum 8 07-25-2006 07:14 PM
yamaha 4 stroke or mercury 4 stroke fish-on The Boating Forum 15 04-28-2005 01:34 AM

 



©2009 TheHullTruth.com

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0